Lovelace v. Department of Justice
Petitioner: Tiwanda Lovelace
Respondent: Department of Justice
Case Number: 2:2022cv00817
Filed: December 29, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: Howard C Nielson
Referring Judge: Cecilia M Romero
Nature of Suit: Freedom of Information Act
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 0552 Freedom of Information Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 21, 2023 Filing 22 REPLY to Response to Motion re #15 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Respondent Department of Justice. (Berndt, Amanda)
February 6, 2023 Filing 20 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #15 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Petitioner Tiwanda Lovelace (slight differences between this and #19 Memorandum). (Attachments: #1 Appendix Index, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4) (alt)
February 6, 2023 Filing 19 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to #15 Motion to Dismiss, filed by Petitioner Tiwanda Lovelace. (dle)
February 3, 2023 Filing 18 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to U.S. Attorney General on 1/24/2023 by Tiwanda Lovelace. (dle)
February 3, 2023 Filing 17 SUMMONS Returned Executed Dept. of Justice OIG on 12/30/2022 by Tiwanda Lovelace. (dle)
February 2, 2023 Filing 21 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Civil Process Clerk, U.S. Attorney's Office for D.C. on 1/20/2023 by Tiwanda Lovelace. (dle)
February 2, 2023 Filing 16 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Civil Process Clerk U.S. Attorney's Office for D.C.Assistant Attorney General for Administration U.S. Department of Justice on 1/20/2023 by Tiwanda Lovelace. (dle) Modified on 2/23/2023 correcting filing date and name of party served (jwt).
February 2, 2023 Filing 15 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and Memorandum in Support filed by Respondent Department of Justice. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 (Declaration of Michael Seidel with exhibits)) Motions referred to Cecilia M. Romero. Attorney Amanda A. Berndt added to party Department of Justice(pty:res)(Berndt, Amanda)
January 18, 2023 Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Office of the Assistant Attorney General, by Tiwanda Lovelace. (dle)
January 18, 2023 Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Civil Division, Brian P. Hudak, Chief, by Tiwanda Lovelace. (dle)
January 12, 2023 Filing 11 Summons Issued as to Civil Division. (ks)
January 12, 2023 Filing 10 Summons Issued as to Assistant Attorney General for Administration. (ks)
January 12, 2023 Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Civil Process Clerk. (ks)
January 12, 2023 Filing 8 Summons Issued as to US Attorney General. (ks)
January 11, 2023 Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Dept. of Justice FBI on 1/5/2023 by Tiwanda Lovelace. (dle) Modified on 1/17/2023 correcting filing date (jwt).
January 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 DOCKET TEXT ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero under 28:636 (b)(1)(B), Magistrate to handle case up to and including R&R on all dispositive matters. No attached document. Motions referred to Cecilia M. Romero. Signed by Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr on 1/3/23. (dla)
December 29, 2022 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Department of Justice. (mh)
December 29, 2022 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Department of Justice-Federal Bureau of Investigations. (mh)
December 29, 2022 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Department of Justice-Office of the Assistant Attorney General. (mh)
December 29, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Email Filing and Notification Form by Tiwanda Lovelace (mh)
December 29, 2022 Filing 2 Full Filing fee: $ 402 received, receipt number 763 (mh)
December 29, 2022 Filing 1 MOTION for Writ of Mandamus filed by Petitioner Tiwanda Lovelace. (Attachments: #1 Verification, #2 Appendix Exhibits for Writ of Mandamus, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Exhibit 3, #6 Exhibit 4, #7 Exhibit 5, #8 Exhibit 6, #9 Exhibit 7, #10 Exhibit 8, #11 Exhibit 9, #12 Exhibit 10, #13 Exhibit 11, #14 Exhibit 12, #15 Exhibit 13, #16 Exhibit 14, #17 Exhibit 15, #18 Exhibit 16, #19 Exhibit 17, #20 Exhibit 18, #21 Exhibit 19, #22 Exhibit 20, #23 Exhibit 21, #24 Exhibit 22, #25 Exhibit 23, #26 Exhibit 24, #27 Exhibit 25, #28 Exhibit 26, #29 Exhibit 27, #30 Exhibit 28, #31 Exhibit 29, #32 Exhibit 30, #33 Exhibit 31, #34 Exhibit 32, #35 Exhibit 33, #36 Exhibit 34, #37 Exhibit 35, #38 Exhibit 36, #39 Exhibit 37, #40 Text of Proposed Order Writ of Mandamus, #41 Civil Cover Sheet)(mh) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/13/2023: #42 Exhibit 8 Rescanned for image quality, #43 Exhibit 10 Rescanned for image quality, #44 Exhibit 11 Rescanned for image quality, #45 Exhibit 14 Rescanned for image quality, #46 Exhibit 22 Rescanned for image quality) (jwt).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lovelace v. Department of Justice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Tiwanda Lovelace
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Department of Justice
Represented By: Amanda A. Berndt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?