Moll v. Delgato et al
| Michael Don Moll |
| Des Delgato, Jen Carver, Nick Aloevera, Jared Willmore, Terry Willmore, Manuel Lopez, Brenda Santos, Carlos Solis, Robert Lee Carreone and Kelly Willmore |
| 2:2022cv00818 |
| December 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Cecilia M Romero |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Plaintiff Michael Don Moll. (alf)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE to Pro Se Plaintiff - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail at the address on the form and place Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Please do not e-file the Consent Form in the case. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Michael Don Moll. Form due by 1/20/2023. (alf)
|
|
Filing 4
COMPLAINT against Nick Aloevera, Robert Lee Carreone, Jen Carver, Des Delgato, Manuel Lopez, Brenda Santos, Carlos Solis, Jared Willmore, Kelly Willmore, Terry Willmore (Originally received by the court on 12/29/2022). (Fee Status: IFP) filed by Michael Don Moll. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Lopez Single Complaint, #2 Exhibit Delgato Single Complaint, #3 Exhibit Kelly Jared Terry Willmore single complaint, #4 Exhibit Aloevera Single Complaint, #5 Exhibit Carver Single Complaint, #6 Exhibit Solis Single Complaint, #7 Exhibit Carreone Single Complaint, #8 Exhibit Email and elect notification, #9 Civil Cover Sheet) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero (haa)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The court will screen his complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e) and Local Civil Rule DUCivR 3-2(b). Plaintiff must not file any motions or other documents during the time the case is screened or until the court orders otherwise. If such documents are filed, they will be lodged on the docket and will not be addressed until screening is completed.The time to serve the complaint is tolled until further order of the court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 12/30/2022. (haa)
|
|
Filing 2
DOCUMENTS LODGED consisting of Complaint, exhibits and civil cover sheet. Note: attached document lodged for reference purposes only; no response required unless specifically ordered by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Lopez Single Complaint, #2 Exhibit Delgato Single Complaint, #3 Exhibit Willmore's Single Complaint, #4 Exhibit Aloevera Single Complaint, #5 Exhibit Carver Single Complaint, #6 Exhibit Solis Single Complaint, #7 Exhibit Carreone Single Complaint, #8 Exhibit Email Electr Notif Form, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(haa)
|
|
Filing 1
**SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero for review, case file forwarded to Magistrate Judge. (Received by the court on: 12/29/2022) filed by Plaintiff Michael Don Moll. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Fed Claim IFP)(haa)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
