In re: iFit
| Plaintiff Placeholder |
| Defendant Placeholder |
| iFIT |
| 2:2022mc00147 |
| October 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 REQUEST for Subpoena Pursuant to 17 USC 512(h) filed by In Re iFIT. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Subpoena to Cloudflare, #2 Exhibit B Cloudflare Abuse Report 10.27.22, #3 Exhibit C Cloudflare Response, #4 Exhibit D Frandsen declaration re Cloudflare Subpoena, #5 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet (Cloudflare))(Frandsen, Brittany) |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and In Re iFIT is directed to E-File the Miscellaneous Case Filing Fee (found under Other Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 49. by the end of the business day. Once the filing fee event is completed the initiating document (Request for Subpoena and cover sheet ) may be E-filed.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (ks) |
| Miscellaneous Case Filing Fee for Request for Subpoena Pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 512(h) received from In Re iFIT. (Filing fee $ 49, receipt number AUTDC-4489246). (Frandsen, Brittany) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
