Gillman v. Utah Department of Corrections et al
| Linda Tracey Gillman |
| Utah Department of Corrections and Brian Nielson |
| Correction Section (FYI) and Prisoner Litigation Unit |
| 2:2023cv00008 |
| January 5, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Utah |
| Howard C Nielson |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE: 1) Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied. 2) A certificate of appealability is denied. Case Closed. Signed by Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr on 3/1/23. (dle)
|
|
Filing 4
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. Signed by Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr. on 3/1/2023. (jtp)
|
|
Filing 3
DOCUMENTS LODGED consisting of letter from plaintiff. Note: attached document lodged for reference purposes only; no response required unless specifically ordered by the court. (jl)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Petitioner Linda Tracey Gillman. (jl)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - State, under 28 U.S.C. 2241 ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 856). filed by Linda Tracey Gillman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) Assigned to Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr (ks) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/13/2023: #2 rescanned for OCR) (kb).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
