Luesse v. Rivera et al
| Michael Richard Luesse, Jr. |
| Rosie Rivera, Salt Lake County Sheriff's Office and Nicholas Brening |
| Prisoner Litigation Unit |
| 2:2023cv00030 |
| January 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Jared C Bennett |
| Jill N Parrish |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
Pursuant to General Order 23-003, case is no longer eligible for magistrate assignment and is randomly assigned to Judge Jill N. Parrish. Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett no longer assigned as the presiding judge to the case. (alf)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION for Service of Process (Prisoner) filed by Plaintiff Michael Richard Luesse, Jr. (Originally received by the court on 01/13/2023) (haa)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION to Appoint Counsel (Originally received by the court on 01/13/2023). filed by Plaintiff Michael Richard Luesse, Jr. (nl)
|
|
Filing 6
COMPLAINT against Nicholas Brening, Rosie Rivera, Salt Lake County Sheriff's Office (Originally received by the court on 01/13/2023). (Fee Status: IFP) filed by Michael Richard Luesse, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exh 1 Benefit Verif Letter, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett (haa)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED:The court will screen this action under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e) and DUCivR 3-2(b). The time to serve the complaint is tolled until further order of the court. If the action is allowed to proceed, the court will order service of process on the Defendant(s). Plaintiff must not file any motions or other documents during the time the case is screened or until the court orders otherwise. Initial Partial fee: Waived. Collection of Fees Sent: No. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett on 01/17/2023. (haa)
|
|
Filing 4
RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Plaintiff Michael Richard Luesse, Jr. (mh)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE to Pro Se Plaintiff - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail at the address on the form and place Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Please do not e-file the Consent Form in the case. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Michael Richard Luesse, Jr. Form due by 2/3/2023. (alf)
|
|
Filing 2
DOCUMENTS LODGED consisting of complaint, exhibit, motions and civil cover sheet.. Note: attached document lodged for reference purposes only; no response required unless specifically ordered by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Benefits Verification Letter, #2 Motion App Counsel, #3 Motion Serv of Process, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(haa)
|
|
Filing 1
**SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett for review, case file forwarded to Magistrate Judge. (Received by the court on: 01/13/2023) filed by Plaintiff Michael Richard Luesse, Jr. (haa)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
