Csicsery v. United Receivables Group et al
| Madeline Csicsery |
| United Receivables Group and Angel Lopez |
| 2:2023cv00044 |
| January 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Daphne A Oberg |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT CERTIFICATE as to Angel Lopez, United Receivables Group. (alf) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Entry of Default as to United Receivables Group, LLC and Angel Lopez filed by Plaintiff Madeline Csicsery. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit in support of request for entry of default)(Pearson, Jared) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Madeline Csicsery as to United Receivables Group served on 1/25/2023, answer due 2/15/2023. (Pearson, Jared) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Madeline Csicsery as to Angel Lopez served on 1/25/2023, answer due 2/15/2023. (Pearson, Jared) |
Filing 7
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 1/23/2023. (alf)
|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued Electronically as to United Receivables Group. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (ks) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/23/2023: #1 Summons United Receivables Group) (ks). |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued Electronically as to Angel Lopez. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (ks) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Madeline Csicsery. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Pearson, Jared) |
| Filing 3 Modification of Docket: Error: Counsel submitted a new complaint to the court by email on 1/19/2023, but did not efile the complaint and pay the filing fee until 1/20/2023. Correction: The filing date has been changed to 1/20/2023 to reflect the date the fee was paid and complaint efiled. re Civil Case Filing Fee. (ks) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re Civil Case Filing Fee. No case-initiating document has been filed. The clerk requests the filer of the original document to refile the pleading, you may use the same receipt number for the payment. The new pleading will receive a new document number on the docket. The complaint must be filed within two business days of this notice; otherwise, the docket for this case number will be closed and no further filings will be permitted under this case number. (ks) |
| Civil Case Filing Fee for FDCPA received from Plaintiff Madeline Csicsery. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4562946). (Pearson, Jared) |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg. Plaintiff Madeline Csicsery is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402. by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (ks) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
