Nielson v. Kekerovic et al
Kathy M Nielson |
Michel Kekerovic and Lula Logistics |
2:2023cv00164 |
March 7, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Cecilia M Romero |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 3/8/2023. (mh) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ADR, e-mailed or mailed to Defendant Lula Logistics, Plaintiff Kathy M Nielson. (ks) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Third District Court Salt Lake County, case number 220906599, (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4611558) filed by Lula Logistics. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Complaint and NEF, #3 Exhibit Proof of Service and NEF, #4 Exhibit Answer and NEF, #5 Exhibit Third District Court docket, #6 Exhibit Notice of Event Due Dates) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero (Thompson, Robert) |
Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero. Defendant Lula Logistics is directed to E-File the Notice of Removal and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402. by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. (ks) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.