Axcess Global Sciences v. Lightning Labs et al
Axcess Global Sciences |
Lightning Labs, VAAD Holdings doing business as Faber Goods, Superior Quality Products, Lanbri Shops doing business as Online Great Deals, S.O Labs and ARK Labs |
2:2023cv00189 |
March 20, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Jared C Bennett |
Howard C Nielson |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Axcess Global Sciences as to S.O Labs served on 4/20/2023, answer due 6/5/2023. (Platt, Brian) |
Filing 19 ORDER granting #18 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to #2 Complaint: Defendants are granted an extension of time up to and including June 5, 2023, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett on 4/24/23. (dle) |
Filing 18 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint filed by Plaintiff Axcess Global Sciences. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Jared C. Bennett.(Platt, Brian) Modified by correcting event type on 4/24/2023 (dle). |
Filing 17 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Axcess Global Sciences as to Lightning Labs served on 4/1/2023, answer due 4/24/2023. (Platt, Brian) |
Filing 16 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Axcess Global Sciences as to VAAD Holdings served on 4/3/2023, answer due 4/24/2023. (Platt, Brian) |
Filing 15 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Axcess Global Sciences as to Superior Quality Products served on 4/3/2023, answer due 4/24/2023. (Platt, Brian) |
Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Axcess Global Sciences as to Lanbri Shops served on 4/3/2023, answer due 4/24/2023. (Platt, Brian) |
Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Axcess Global Sciences as to ARK Labs served on 4/3/2023, answer due 4/24/2023. (Platt, Brian) |
Filing 12 Summons Issued Electronically as to VAAD Holdings. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (haa) |
Filing 11 Summons Issued Electronically as to Superior Quality Products. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (haa) |
Filing 10 Summons Issued Electronically as to S.O Labs. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (haa) |
Filing 9 Summons Issued Electronically as to Lightning Labs. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (haa) |
Filing 8 Summons Issued Electronically as to Lanbri Shops. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (haa) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued Electronically as to ARK Labs. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (haa) |
Filing 6 ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett on 3/22/23. (dle) |
Filing 5 DOCKET TEXT ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr on 3/22/23. (dle) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY TO PRESIDE OVER CASE- Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, and DUCivR 72-4, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail at the address on the form. Please do not efile the Consent Form in the case. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Axcess Global Sciences. (Notice generated by Court) Form due by 4/10/2023. (ks) |
Filing 3 Report on the Filing of an action sent to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (ks) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4623642) filed by Axcess Global Sciences. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Civil Cover Sheet) (Platt, Brian) |
Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr. Plaintiff Axcess Global Sciences is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402. by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (ks) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.