S. v. Oracle Cerner Corporation et al
| M.S., individually and on behalf of K.S., a minor, and M. S. |
| ORACLE CERNER CORPORATION and HEALTHE OPTIONS COMPANION PLAN |
| 2:2023cv00194 |
| March 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Cecilia M Romero |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS for appearance phv mailed to attorney Chris Leopold, for Defendants Healthe Options Companion Plan, Oracle Cerner Corporation. (alf) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by M. S. as to Oracle Cerner Corporation Waiver sent on 4/5/2023, answer due 6/5/2023. (King, Brian) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by M. S. as to Healthe Options Companion Plan Waiver sent on 4/5/2023, answer due 6/5/2023. (King, Brian) |
Filing 2
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 3/23/2023. (alf)
|
| Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero added. Case number will now read 2:23-cv-00194-CMR. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (haa) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against HEALTHE OPTIONS COMPANION PLAN, ORACLE CERNER CORPORATION (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4625898) filed by M.S., individually and on behalf of K.S., a minor,. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (King, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
