King v. City of Provo et al
Nisha Koy Elkington King |
City of Provo, Michelle Kaufusi, R. Fred Ross and John Doe |
2:2023cv00219 |
April 4, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Dustin B Pead |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Civil Cover Sheet (JS44) re #1 Complaint Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance, filed by Nisha Koy Elkington King. (Tycksen, Steven) |
Filing 3 ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 4/6/2023. (alf) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re #1 Complaint. The Civil Cover Sheet is missing or incomplete. All civil actions presented from filing must be accompanied by a completed Civil Cover Sheet. See Local Rule DUCivR3-4. Counsel must file a completed Civil Cover Sheet JS44 immediately. (ks) |
Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead added. Case number will now read 2:23-cv-00219-DBP. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (ks) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4638505) filed by Nisha Koy Elkington King. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A) (Tycksen, Steven) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.