Kyco Services LLC v. Cedar and Sage Homes, LLC
| Kyco Services LLC |
| Cedar and Sage Homes, LLC |
| 2:2023cv00235 |
| April 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Jill N Parrish |
| Dustin B Pead |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
First MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Cedar and Sage Homes, LLC. Attorney Barry G. Stratford added to party Cedar and Sage Homes, LLC(pty:dft)(Stratford, Barry)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 4/21/23. (dle)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 04/20/2023. (lwh)
|
|
Filing 4
CIVIL STANDING ORDER Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 04/20/2023. (lwh)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued Electronically as to Cedar and Sage Homes, LLC. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (ks)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY TO PRESIDE OVER CASE- Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, and DUCivR 72-4, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail at the address on the form. Please do not efile the Consent Form in the case. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Kyco Services LLC. (Notice generated by Court) Form due by 5/2/2023. (ks)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Kyco Services LLC (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4644956) filed by Kyco Services LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F) (Aycock, Robert)
|
|
Judge Jill N. Parrish added. Case number will now read 2:23-CV-00235-JNP. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (ks)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kyco Services LLC v. Cedar and Sage Homes, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kyco Services LLC | |
| Represented By: | Robert E. Aycock |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Cedar and Sage Homes, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Barry G. Stratford |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
