D. et al v. United Healthcare Insurance Company et al
C.D., A.R., C. D. and A. R. |
United Healthcare Insurance Company, United Behavioral Health, Rabobank and Rabobank Welfare Benefit Plan |
2:2023cv00275 |
April 28, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
David Barlow |
Daphne A Oberg |
Jill N Parrish |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by C. D., A. R. as to Rabobank Waiver sent on 4/28/2023, answer due 6/27/2023. (King, Brian) |
Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by C. D., A. R. as to Rabobank Welfare Benefit Plan Waiver sent on 4/28/2023, answer due 6/27/2023. (King, Brian) |
Filing 10 ORDER OF RECUSAL Judge David Barlow recused. Case reassigned to Judge Jill N. Parrish for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge David Barlow on 6/14/2023. (mh) |
Filing 9 DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The deadline for Defendants United Behavioral Health and United Healthcare Insurance Company to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is extended to July 28, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 6/13/2023. No attached document. (med) |
Filing 8 Modification of Docket re #7 MOTION: Pleading event changed to MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer per chambers. (mh) |
Filing 7 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer responsive pleading and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants United Behavioral Health, United Healthcare Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Daphne A. Oberg.(Bauhs, Maryann) Modified by correcting event and text per chambers on 6/12/2023 (mh). Modified on 6/12/2023 (mh). |
Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by C. D., A. R. as to United Behavioral Health Waiver sent on 4/28/2023, answer due 6/27/2023; United Healthcare Insurance Company Waiver sent on 4/28/2023, answer due 6/27/2023. (King, Brian) |
Filing 5 RECEIVED Magistrate Availability Form from Plaintiffs C. D., A. R.. (alf) |
Filing 4 ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 5/3/2023. (mh) |
Filing 3 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge David Barlow on 05/02/2023. (aja) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY TO PRESIDE OVER CASE- Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, and DUCivR 72-4, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail at the address on the form. Please do not efile the Consent Form in the case. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiffs A.R., C.D.. Form due by 5/19/2023. (haa) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4662755) filed by C.D., A.R.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (King, Brian) |
Judge David Barlow added. Case number will now read 2:23-cv-00275-DBB. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (haa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.