Bedrock Quartz Surfaces, LLC v. Rock Tops Holdings LLC
| Bedrock Quartz Surfaces, LLC |
| Rock Tops Holdings LLC doing business as Rock Tops |
| 2:2023cv00310 |
| May 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| David Barlow |
| Cecilia M Romero |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
NOTICE of Appearance by Steven R. Sumsion on behalf of Rock Tops Holdings LLC (Sumsion, Steven)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE OF NON-CONSENT: Consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge under DUCivR 72-4 has not been obtained. Case randomly assigned to Judge David Barlow and Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero is automatically referred under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero no longer assigned as the presiding judge to the case. (alf)
|
|
Filing 9
RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Plaintiff Bedrock Quartz Surfaces, LLC. (mh)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail at the address on the form and place Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Please do not e-file the Consent Form in the case. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Bedrock Quartz Surfaces, LLC, Defendant Rock Tops Holdings LLC. Form due by 6/27/2023. (alf)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE OF ADR, e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Bedrock Quartz Surfaces, LLC, Defendant Rock Tops Holdings LLC. (alf)
|
|
Filing 6
Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Rock Tops Holdings LLC. Attorney Steven R. Sumsion added to party Rock Tops Holdings LLC(pty:dft)(Sumsion, Steven)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 5/11/2023. (alf)
|
|
Filing 4
Summons Issued Electronically as to Rock Tops Holdings LLC. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (haa)
|
|
Filing 3
Civil Cover Sheet (JS44) re 2 Notice of Deficiency, #1 Complaint Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance, filed by Bedrock Quartz Surfaces, LLC. (Braithwaite, Jared)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re #1 Complaint. The Civil Cover Sheet is missing or incomplete. All civil actions presented for filing must be accompanied by a completed Civil Cover Sheet. See Local Rule DUCivR3-4. Counsel must file a completed Civil Cover Sheet JS44 immediately. (ks)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Rock Tops Holdings LLC (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4674227) filed by Bedrock Quartz Surfaces, LLC. (Braithwaite, Jared)
|
|
Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero added. Case number will now read 2:23-cv-00310-CMR. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (ks)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
