Motion Products v. Reese
Plaintiff: Motion Products and James Wallner
Defendant: Christopher B. Reese
Case Number: 2:2023cv00336
Filed: May 24, 2023
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: Howard C Nielson
Referring Judge: Dustin B Pead
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 19, 2023 Filing 15 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under FRCP 7.1 filed by Plaintiffs Motion Products, James Wallner. (Ramirez, Jessica)
July 13, 2023 Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Motion Products, James Wallner as to Christopher B. Reese served on 7/12/2023, answer due 8/2/2023. (Ramirez, Jessica)
June 23, 2023 Filing 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Christopher B. Reese. filed by Motion Products, James Wallner. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E) (Ramirez, Jessica)
June 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 DOCKET TEXT ORDER. In #2 Complaint, Plaintiffs invoke the court's diversity jurisdiction, but fail adequately to allege the citizenship of two of the parties. Specifically, Plaintiffs allege that "Plaintiff James Wallner ("Wallner") is a Wisconsin resident" and that "[u]pon information and belief, Defendant Christopher B. Reese ("Reese") resides in Salt Lake County, Utah." Dkt. No. 2 23 (emphases added). It is well settled, however, that diversity jurisdiction turns on citizenship, not residence; that citizenship turns on domicile; and that domicile is not the same thing as residence. See, e.g., Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield, 490 U.S. 30, 48 (1989); Siloam Springs Hotel, L.L.C. v. Century Sur. Co., 781 F.3d 1233, 1238 (10th Cir. 2015); Whitelock v. Leatherman, 460 F.2d 507, 514 (10th Cir. 1972). No later than July 7, 2023, Plaintiffs shall file an amended complaint that correctly alleges Mr. Wallner's and Mr. Reese's citizenship for purposes of diversity jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. 1653. If the amended complaint fails adequately to allege subject matter jurisdiction, this action will be dismissed. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr., on 6/22/2023. (atn)
June 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting #9 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Kristin Foster for Motion Products, James Wallner.Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must register to efile and receive electronic notification of case activity in the District of Utah at #https://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/cmecf/dcbk.html. Instructions are available at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-electronic-case-filing.A Pro Hac Vice Attorney who fails to register for CM/ECF access will not receive notifications of electronic filings.Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice may download a copy of the District of Utahs local rules from the courts web site at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/rules-practice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 6/2/23. (dle)
June 1, 2023 Filing 10 Summons Issued Electronically as to Christopher B. Reese. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (haa)
June 1, 2023 Filing 9 Plaintiff's MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Kristin Foster as counsel for Plaintiffs Motion Products, Inc. and James Wallner, Registration fee $ 50, receipt number AUTDC-4696258,Attorneys awaiting Pro Hac Vice admission should immediately register to efile and receive electronic notification of case activity in the District of Utah at #https://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/cmecf/dcbk.html.Registration requests will not be approved until the court has granted the pro hac vice motion. Instructions are available on the court's website at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-electronic-case-filing. filed by Plaintiffs Motion Products, James Wallner. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Text of Proposed Order) Attorney Jessica Ramirez added to party James Wallner(pty:pla)(Ramirez, Jessica)
May 26, 2023 Filing 8 RECEIVED Magistrate Availability Form from Plaintiffs Motion Products, James Wallner. (alf)
May 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 5/26/23. (dle)
May 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 DOCKET TEXT ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr on 5/25/23. (dle)
May 25, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS for appearance Pro Hac Vice e-mailed to attorney Kristin Foster, plaintiff Motion Products and James Wallner. (haa)
May 25, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY TO PRESIDE OVER CASE- Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, and DUCivR 72-4, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at [email protected] or mail at the address on the form. Please do not efile the Consent Form in the case. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiffs Motion Products, James Wallner. Form due by 6/15/2023. (haa)
May 25, 2023 Filing 3 Modification of Docket: Error: Plaintiff James Wallner was not added when opening the case. Correction: Plaintiff James Wallner added on 05/25/2023. re #2 Complaint,. (haa)
May 24, 2023 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Christopher B. Reese (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4687833) filed by Motion Products. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E) (Ramirez, Jessica)
May 24, 2023 Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr. Plaintiff Motion Products is directed to E-File the complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to [email protected] for issuance. (haa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Motion Products v. Reese
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Motion Products
Represented By: Jessica Ramirez
Represented By: Whitney Hulet Krogue
Represented By: Kristin C. Foster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Wallner
Represented By: Jessica Ramirez
Represented By: Kristin C. Foster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christopher B. Reese
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?