Feld v. Viceroy Device Corporation et al
| Michael Feld |
| Viceroy Device Corporation doing business as Deviceroy Corporation and Stephen K. Ellis |
| 2:2023cv00353 |
| May 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Tena Campbell |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
OBJECTIONS To Motion for Attorney's Fee filed by Stephen K. Ellis. (Ford, Adam)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER denying #8 Motion for Reconsideration; granting #14 Motion for Extension of Time: defendants have 5 days from the date of this Order to respond to #11 Motion for Attorney Fees. The court continues to award the Plaintiff reasonable attorney's fees and costs in bringing the Motion to Remand but declines to award further attorney's fees for the costs of responding to the Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 7/20/23 (alt)
|
|
Filing 15
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re #11 MOTION for Attorney Fees. The document filed is not a true motion and should not have been filed using the "Motions" filing event but instead with the "Memorandum (NOT to motion)" filing event. however, because filer did use the "Motions" filing event, the relief will be changed to "Attorney Fees" and entry text edited to reflect this. Filers are reminded to use the "Motions" filing event ONLY when filing actual motions. (alt)
|
|
Filing 14
MOTION for Extension of Time Deadline to Object to Affidavit of Attorney's Fees filed by Defendants Stephen K. Ellis, Viceroy Device Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Ford, Adam)
|
|
Filing 13
REQUEST to Submit for Decision re #8 MOTION re #6 Order on Motion to Remand to State Court and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Stephen K. Ellis, Viceroy Device Corporation. (Ford, Adam)
|
|
Filing 12
REPLY to Response to Motion re #8 MOTION re #6 Order on Motion to Remand to State Court and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Stephen K. Ellis, Viceroy Device Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit NY Court Denying Motion to Disqualify)(Ford, Adam)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Plaintiff Michael Feld. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2)(Hafen, Tyson) Modified on 7/20/2023: changed motion relief to "Attorney Fees" however doc shouldn't have been filed as a motion (alt)
|
|
Filing 10
RECEIPT: remand order was received by the New York County Supreme Court on 6/15/23 (alt)
|
|
Filing 9
Plaintiff's RESPONSE to Motion re #8 MOTION re #6 Order on Motion to Remand to State Court and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Michael Feld. (Hafen, Tyson)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION re #6 Order on Motion to Remand to State Court and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Stephen K. Ellis, Viceroy Device Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Deviceroy Employment Agreement), #2 Exhibit B (Feld Employment Agreement), #3 Exhibit C (Opposition to Order to Show Cause to Disqualify Counsel))(Ford, Adam)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been remanded to Supreme Court of the State of New York. Notice, order, and copy of docket sent via US Mail. (alt)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Motion to Remand to State Court (Supreme Court of the State of New York in New York County) and Awarding Reasonable Attorney Fees - CASE CLOSED. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 6/2/23 (alt)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION to Remand to State Court Supreme Court of New York, New York County, Commercial Division and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Michael Feld. (Attachments: #1 Brief - Memo of Law, #2 Certificate of Service, #3 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order) Attorney Tyson E. Hafen added to party Michael Feld(pty:pla)(Hafen, Tyson)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF INELIGIBLE ATTORNEY -Attorney Leslie D. Corwin, for Plaintiff Michael Feld, for Plaintiff Michael Feld, has been notified that she has not been admitted to practice in the U.S. District Court District of Utah or has not been filed a Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice and can not practice before this court. (haa)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE OF INELIGIBLE ATTORNEY -Attorney Matthew M. Caminiti, for Plaintiff Michael Feld, has been notified that he has not been admitted to practice in the U.S. District Court District of Utah or has not been filed a Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice and can not practice before this court. (haa)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY TO PRESIDE OVER CASE- Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, and DUCivR 72-4, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail at the address on the form. Please do not efile the Consent Form in the case. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Defendants Stephen K. Ellis, Viceroy Device Corporation. Form due by 6/20/2023. (haa)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Supreme Court of New York, New York County, case number 651902/2023, (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number BUTDC-4692302) filed by Stephen K. Ellis, Viceroy Device Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Ford, Adam)
|
|
Judge Tena Campbell added. Case number will now read 2:23-cv-00353-TC. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (haa)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
