Neil v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
| Scott Neil |
| Union Pacific Railroad Company |
| 2:2023cv00366 |
| June 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Jared C Bennett |
| Jill N Parrish |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 9/8/2023. Joinder of Parties due by 9/29/2023. Expert Discovery due by 9/18/2024. Dispositive or Potentially Dispositive Motions due by 10/16/2024. If the parties do not intend to file dispositive or potentially dispositive motions, a scheduling conference will be held for purposes of setting a trial date on 10/23/2024 at 02:00 PM Via Zoom before Judge Jill N. Parrish. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett on 7/19/23. (dle)
|
|
Filing 10
REPORT OF ATTORNEY PLANNING MEETING. (Driggs, M'Kay)
|
|
Filing 9
SECOND DOCKET TEXT ORDER TO COMPLY WITH DUCivR 81-2(d)(4). DUCivR 81-2(d)(4) provides that "[a]t the same time the Attorney Planning Meeting Report is filed, the plaintiff must email a proposed scheduling order in editable format (e.g., WordPerfect or MS Word) to the assigned judge in the case, or if an order referring the case to a magistrate judge has been entered, to the referred magistrate judge." #7 REPORT OF ATTORNEY PLANNING MEETING was filed, but Plaintiff did not email a proposed scheduling order to the court as required by DUCivR 81-2(d)(4). The court HEREBY ORDERS Plaintiff to, within 7 days of the date of this order, email a proposed scheduling order in word processing format to the court at utdecf_bennett@utd.uscourts.gov. The form for the court's proposed scheduling order can be found at https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/Proposed%20Scheduling%20Order.docx. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett on 07/13/2023. (docket text order; no attached document) (jcd)
|
|
Filing 8
DOCKET TEXT ORDER TO COMPLY WITH DUCivR 81-2(d)(4). DUCivR 81-2(d)(4) provides that "[a]t the same time the Attorney Planning Meeting Report is filed, the plaintiff must email a proposed scheduling order in editable format (e.g., WordPerfect or MS Word) to the assigned judge in the case, or if an order referring the case to a magistrate judge has been entered, to the referred magistrate judge." #7 REPORT OF ATTORNEY PLANNING MEETING was filed, but Plaintiff did not email a proposed scheduling order to the court as required by DUCivR 81-2(d)(4). The court HEREBY ORDERS Plaintiff to, within 7 days of the date of this order, email a proposed scheduling order in word processing format to the court at utdecf_bennett@utd.uscourts.gov. The form for the court's proposed scheduling order can be found at https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/Proposed%20Scheduling%20Order.docx. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett on 07/05/2023. (docket text order; no attached document) (jcd)
|
|
Filing 7
REPORT OF ATTORNEY PLANNING MEETING. (Farrell, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE OF NON-CONSENT: Consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge under DUCivR 72-4 has not been obtained. Case randomly assigned to Judge Jill N. Parrish and Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett is automatically referred under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett no longer assigned as the presiding judge to the case. (alf)
|
|
Filing 5
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under FRCP 7.1 filed by Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company identifying UNP as Corporate Parent. (Farrell, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett on 6/2/2023. (alf)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail at the address on the form and place Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Please do not e-file the Consent Form in the case. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Scott Neil, Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company. Form due by 6/23/2023. (alf)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE OF ADR, e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Scott Neil, Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company. (ks)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 3rd District Court, Salt Lake County, case number 230903161, (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4696281) filed by Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Plaintiff's Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - Return of Service, #4 Exhibit C - Return of Electronic Notification dated May 2, 2023, #5 Exhibit D - Return of Electronic Notification dated May 4, 2023, #6 Exhibit E - Answer and Affirmative Defenses of Union Pacific, #7 Exhibit F - Return of Electronic Notification dated May 25, 2023, #8 Exhibit G - Notice of Events Due, #9 Exhibit H -Return of Electronic Notification dated May 26, 2023, #10 Exhibit I - Amended Answer and Affirmative Defenses of Union Pacific, #11 Exhibit J - Return of Electronic Notification dated June 1, 2023, #12 Exhibit K - Declaration of Union Pacific) (Farrell, Thomas)
|
|
Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett added. Case number will now read 2:23-cv-366-JCB. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (ks)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Neil v. Union Pacific Railroad Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Scott Neil | |
| Represented By: | Daniel S. Garner |
| Represented By: | M'Kay Driggs |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company | |
| Represented By: | Gina Marie Rossi |
| Represented By: | Thomas Walker Farrell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
