Martinez-Herrera v. Thomas
| Brayan Martinez-Herrera |
| Andrew W Thomas |
| 2:2023cv00512 |
| August 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Daphne A Oberg |
| Jill N Parrish |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Insurance Contract |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 Defendant's RESPONSE to Motion re #11 MOTION to Remand to State Court Utah State Court, Third District, Case No. 230903979 and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Andrew W Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Andrew M. Thomas, #2 Exhibit 2 - Declaration of Emma Thomas)(Sano, A.) |
Filing 15
DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting #13 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to #11 MOTION to Remand to Utah State Court. Defendant shall file his response no later than September 26, 2023. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 9/21/2023. No attached document. (apf)
|
| Filing 14 Motions No Longer Referred: #13 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #11 MOTION to Remand to State Court. The district judge will address the motion. (rw) |
| Filing 13 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #11 MOTION to Remand to State Court Utah State Court, Third District, Case No. 230903979 and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Andrew W Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Extending Time for Defendant's Response) Motions referred to Daphne A. Oberg.(Sano, A.) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT of Civil Standing Order #7 filed by Defendant Andrew W Thomas (Sano, A.) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Remand to State Court Utah State Court, Third District, Case No. 230903979 and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Brayan Martinez-Herrera. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 - Defendant Statement, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2 - Plaintiff Statement, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3 - Def. Guilty Plea, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 4 - Affidavit of Non-Service, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 5- Affidavit of Service, #6 Exhibit Exhibit 6 - Traffic School Certificate)(Adams, Kyle) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT of Civil Standing Order #7 filed by Plaintiff Brayan Martinez-Herrera (Adams, Kyle) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 8/30/23 (alt)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate Judge to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 8/29/2023. (lwh)
|
|
Filing 7
CIVIL STANDING ORDER Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 8/28/2023. (lwh)
|
| Filing 6 RECEIVED Magistrate Availability Form from Defendant Andrew W Thomas. (mh) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Andrew W Thomas.(Sano, A.) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ADR, e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Brayan Martinez-Herrera, Defendant Andrew W Thomas. (ks) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY TO PRESIDE OVER CASE- Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, and DUCivR 72-4, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail at the address on the form. Please do not efile the Consent Form in the case. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Brayan Martinez-Herrera, Defendant Andrew W Thomas. (Notice generated by Court) Form due by 8/29/2023. (ks) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 3rd District Court Salt Lake County, case number 230903979, (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4771040) filed by Andrew W Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Civil Docket Sheet) (Sano, A.) |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge Jill N. Parrish. Defendant Andrew W Thomas is directed to E-File the Notice of Removal and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402. by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. (ks) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Martinez-Herrera v. Thomas | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Brayan Martinez-Herrera | |
| Represented By: | Kyle D. Adams |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew W Thomas | |
| Represented By: | A. Joseph Sano |
| Represented By: | Nicholas R. Remkes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
