Cuara R. v. Atlantic Legal Foundation
Plaintiff: Constantino Cuara R.
Defendant: Atlantic Legal Foundation
Case Number: 2:2023cv00568
Filed: August 28, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: Jared C Bennett
Referring Judge: Daphne A Oberg
2 Judge: Robert J Shelby
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 DOCKET TEXT ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Mr. Cuara Rodriguez filed approximately 49 cases in this court between July 6, 2023, and September 18, 2023. Chief Judge Robert J. Shelby finds that the reassignment of this case is necessary for the efficient administration of justice. Therefore, under DUCivR 83-2(a)(2), the Chief Judge sua sponte orders the clerks office to transfer this case to Judge Shelby. The initial referral to the magistrate judge is vacated. Upon transfer, the case shall be referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B). Any new case filed by Mr. Cuara Rodriguez in this district after September 18, 2023, shall be assigned or reassigned to Judge Shelby and referred to Magistrate Judge Bennett under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B). Signed by Judge Robert J. Shelby on 9/21/2023. (alf)
September 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE OF NON-CONSENT Consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge under DUCivR 72-4 has not been obtained. Case randomly assigned to Judge Dale A. Kimball and Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg. Magistrate Judge is automatically referred under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B). Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg no longer assigned as the presiding judge to the case. (mh)
August 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Permitting the Filing of an Amended Complaint by 9/20/2023. Other than an amended complaint, the restriction on filing motions or other documents set forth in the courts July 14, 2023 order #3 remains in place. Failure to file an amended complaint may result in dismissal of this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 8/29/2023. (alf)
August 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Atlantic Legal Foundation (Originally received by the court on 08/28/2023). (Fee Status: IFP) filed by Constantino Cuara R.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Prints and Account Sheet, #2 Civil Cover Sheet ) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg (haa)
August 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The court will screen his complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e) and Local Civil Rule DUCivR 3-2(b). Mr. Cuara Rodriguez may complete and return forms provided by the court. The clerks office is directed to provide Mr. Cuara Rodriguez with the email filing and electronic notification form for unrepresented parties. Other than court forms, Mr. Cuara Rodriguez must not file any motions or other documents during the time the case is screened or until the court orders otherwise. If such documents are filed, they will be lodged on the docket and will not be addressed until screening is completed. The time to serve the complaint is tolled until further order of the court. If the action is allowed to proceed, the court will order service of process on the defendant(s). Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 08/29/2023. (haa)
August 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE TO THE PLAINTIFF - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail at the address on the form and place Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Please do not e-file the Consent Form in the case. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Constantino Cuara R.. Form due by 9/19/2023. (mh)
August 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 DOCUMENTS LODGED consisting of Complaint, exhibit and civil cover sheet.. Note: attached document lodged for reference purposes only; no response required unless specifically ordered by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Prints and Account Sheet, #2 Civil Cover Sheet )(haa)
August 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 **SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg for review, case file forwarded to Magistrate Judge. (Received by the court on: 08/28/2023) filed by Plaintiff Constantino Cuara R.. (haa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cuara R. v. Atlantic Legal Foundation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Constantino Cuara R.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Atlantic Legal Foundation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?