Lopez v. Target
| Pearl Lopez |
| Target |
| 2:2023cv00593 |
| September 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Jared C Bennett |
| Jill N Parrish |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 NOTICE OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT of Civil Standing Order filed by Defendant Target (Weron, Kathleen) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT of Civil Standing Order #16 filed by Plaintiff Pearl Lopez (Handy, Preston) |
Filing 16
CIVIL STANDING ORDER Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 10/12/2023. (lwh)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER granting #14 Stipulated Motion for Scheduling Order: Amended Pleadings due by 8/14/2024. Joinder of Parties due by 8/14/2024. Expert Discovery due by 1/31/2025. Dispositive or Potentially Dispositive Motions due by 3/17/2025. If the parties do not intend to file dispositive or potentially dispositive motions, a scheduling conference will be held for purposes of setting a trial date on 3/24/2025 at 02:00 PM Via Zoom before Judge Jill N. Parrish. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett on 10/3/23. (dle)
|
| Filing 14 Stipulated MOTION for Scheduling Order and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Target. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Attorney's Planning Meeting Report, #2 Exhibit B - Proposed Scheduling Order) Motions referred to Jared C. Bennett.(Weron, Kathleen) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Reliance on Jury Demand by Pearl Lopez (Handy, Preston) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re #11 Attorney Planning Meeting Report. Counsel is requested follow the instructions at paragraph 3 of the #4 Order to Propose schedule. The new pleading will receive a new document number on the docket. (dle) |
| Filing 11 REPORT OF ATTORNEY PLANNING MEETING. (Weron, Kathleen) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF NON-CONSENT Consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge under DUCivR 72-4 has not been obtained. Case randomly assigned to Judge Jill N. Parrish and Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. Magistrate Judge is automatically referred under 28 U.S.C636(b)(1)(A). Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett no longer assigned as the presiding judge to the case. (mh) |
| Filing 9 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Plaintiff Pearl Lopez. (mh) |
| Filing 8 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Defendant Target. (mh) |
| Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under FRCP 7.1 filed by Defendant Target. (Weron, Kathleen) |
| Filing 6 Defendant Target Corporation's ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Target.(Weron, Kathleen) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail at the address on the form and place Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Please do not e-file the Consent Form in the case. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Pearl Lopez, Defendant Target. Form due by 9/26/2023. (mh) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett on 9/1/2023. (alf)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ADR, e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Pearl Lopez, Defendant Target. (ks) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 3rd District Court Salt Lake County, case number 230905674, (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4798044) filed by Target. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Third District Court Docket, #3 Exhibit C - Third District Court Case Pleadings, #4 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Weron, Kathleen) |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. Defendant Target is directed to E-File the Notice of Removal and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402. by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. (ks) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lopez v. Target | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Pearl Lopez | |
| Represented By: | Preston L. Handy |
| Represented By: | Daniel L. Steele |
| Represented By: | Garrett S. Handy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Target | |
| Represented By: | Kathleen D Weron |
| Represented By: | Amanda Fuller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
