AVT Nevada LP v. McAlary
AVT Nevada LP |
Christopher McAlary |
2:2023cv00594 |
September 1, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Dustin B Pead |
Ted Stewart |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ANSWER to #7 Counterclaim filed by AVT Nevada LP.(Strassberg, Evan) |
Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Christopher McAlary. filed by AVT Nevada LP. (Strassberg, Evan) |
Filing 7 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand , COUNTERCLAIM against AVT Nevada LP filed by Christopher McAlary. Attorney Gary R. Guelker added to party Christopher McAlary(pty:dft)(Guelker, Gary) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by AVT Nevada LP as to Christopher McAlary served on 9/13/2023, answer due 10/4/2023. (Strassberg, Evan) |
Filing 5 ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 9/12/2023. (mh) |
Filing 4 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate Judge to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 9/11/2023. (cg) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued Electronically as to Christopher McAlary. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (haa) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY TO PRESIDE OVER CASE- Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, and DUCivR 72-4, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail at the address on the form. Please do not efile the Consent Form in the case. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff AVT Nevada LP. (Notice generated by Court) Form due by 9/22/2023. (ks) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Christopher McAlary (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4797599) filed by AVT Nevada LP. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Strassberg, Evan) |
Judge Ted Stewart added. Case number will now read 2:23-cv-00594-TS. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (ks) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: AVT Nevada LP v. McAlary | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Counter defendant: AVT Nevada LP | |
Represented By: | Richard F. Ensor |
Represented By: | Evan S. Strassberg |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Counter claimant: Christopher McAlary | |
Represented By: | Gary R. Guelker |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.