Bowler v. State Farm Insurance
Chad Bowler |
State Farm Insurance and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company |
2:2023cv00678 |
September 28, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Tena Campbell |
Dustin B Pead |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Insurance Contract |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 15 NOTICE OF NON-CONSENT Consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge under DUCivR 72-4 has not been obtained. Case randomly assigned to Judge Tena Campbell and Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead is automatically referred under 28 U.S.C636(b)(1)(A). Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead no longer assigned as the presiding judge to the case. (mh) |
|
Filing 13 Stipulated MOTION for Scheduling Order filed by Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Attorney Planning Meeting, #2 Text of Proposed Order Scheduling Order)(Neilson, Chet) |
|
Filing 11 Stipulated MOTION to Substitute Party Correct Defendant filed by Defendant State Farm Insurance. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Substitute Correct Defendant)(Neilson, Chet) |
Filing 10 AMENDED ANSWER to Complaint filed by State Farm Insurance. (Neilson, Chet) |
Filing 9 SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL Chet W. Neilson replacing Blake A. Hallock and Bryan J. Stoddard as counsel on behalf of State Farm Insurance. (Neilson, Chet) |
Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under FRCP 7.1 filed by Defendant State Farm Insurance identifying State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company as Corporate Parent. (Stoddard, Bryan) |
Filing 7 Defendant ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand filed by State Farm Insurance.(Stoddard, Bryan) |
|
Filing 5 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Plaintiff Chad Bowler. (mh) |
Filing 4 NOTICE - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail at the address on the form and place Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Please do not e-file the Consent Form in the case. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Chad Bowler, Defendant State Farm Insurance. Form due by 10/20/2023. (mh) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ADR, e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Chad Bowler, Defendant State Farm Insurance. (sg) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 3rd District Court Salt Lake County, case number 230906772, (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4824891) filed by State Farm Insurance. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Complaint) (Stoddard, Bryan) |
Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead. Defendant State Farm Insurance is directed to E-File the Notice of Removal and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. (sg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.