Bradshaw v. Central Intelligence Agency
| Michael Scott Bradshaw |
| Central Intelligence Agency |
| 2:2023cv00811 |
| November 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Central Office |
| Robert J Shelby |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
DOCKET TEXT ORDER- Per Plaintiff Michael Scott Bradshaw's #12 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, the court dismisses the case. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. Signed by Judge Robert J. Shelby on 12/21/2023. (mh)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Michael Scott Bradshaw. (mh)
|
|
Filing 11
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying #9 second MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and #10 MOTION to Seal Case. Signed by Judge Robert J. Shelby on 12/14/2023. (mh)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION to Seal Case and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Michael Scott Bradshaw (Attachments: #1 Appendix of misc. documents) (alt)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Michael Scott Bradshaw (alt)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE OF FILING Additional Documents filed by Plaintiff Michael Scott Bradshaw (Attachments: #1 Document 1, #2 Document 2) (alt)
|
|
Filing 7
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying #2 Motion to Seal Case (styled as 'for Secrecy'); denying without prejudice #3 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Signed by Judge Robert J. Shelby on 11/13/23 (alt)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER OF RECUSAL Judge Tena Campbell recused. Case reassigned to Judge Robert J. Shelby for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 11/9/2023. (jwt)
|
|
Filing 5
Summons Issued as to Central Intelligence Agency. (alf)
|
|
Filing 4
Requested Summons as to Central Intelligence Agency. (nl)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, MOTION for Preliminary (Temporary) Injunction, and MOTION for Permanent Injunction, filed by Plaintiff Michael Scott Bradshaw. (Attachments: #1 Motion for Temporary Injunction, #2 Motion for Permanent Injunction)(nl)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Secrecy (Seal Case) filed by Plaintiff Michael Scott Bradshaw. (nl)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Central Intelligence Agency (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 4082) (Fee Status: paid) filed by Michael Scott Bradshaw. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Statement, #2 Exhibit 2- Request for Relief, #3 Civil Cover Sheet ) Assigned to Judge Tena Campbell (nl)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bradshaw v. Central Intelligence Agency | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael Scott Bradshaw | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Central Intelligence Agency | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
