Doe v. Nebo School District et al
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Defendant: Nebo School District and Dylan Porter Dewey
Case Number: 2:2023cv00812
Filed: November 7, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: Jared C Bennett
Referring Judge: Howard C Nielson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Education
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 5, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 22 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Defendant Dylan Porter Dewey. (Gevas, Miles)
December 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 21 NOTICE of Non-Opposition to Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Cure Pseudonymous Complaint by Dylan Porter Dewey (Gevas, Miles)
December 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MOTION to Compel Plaintiff to Cure Pseudonymous Complaint and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Nebo School District. (Hopkins, Andrew)
December 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 19 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL of Mark Carlson filed by Mark L. Carlson on behalf of Jane Doe (Carlson, Mark)
December 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 18 CLERK'S NOTICE OF ERROR re #15 Notice of Appearance, #16 Notice of Appearance, #17 Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel. Description of error: documents have wrong judge information on them including name of a non-federal judge. Filers are reminded to keep track of any/all judge reassignments and ensure that all case information on documents matches that appearing at the top of each CM/ECF screen before submitting same. (alt)
December 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 17 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL of Mark L. Carlson filed by Mark L. Carlson on behalf of Jane Doe (Carlson, Mark)
December 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Geena Arata on behalf of Jane Doe (Arata, Geena)
December 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel S. Garner on behalf of Jane Doe (Garner, Daniel)
November 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 NOTICE OF CONSENT Under DUCivR 72-4, returned Consent Forms from all relevant parties are now filed. The Magistrate Judge is presiding by consent.Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett as presider. Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr no longer assigned to case. (mh)
November 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 RECEIVED Magistrate Availability Form from Defendant Dylan Porter Dewey. (mh)
November 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 RECEIVED Magistrate Availability Form from Plaintiff Jane Doe. (mh)
November 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 RECEIVED Magistrate Availability Form from Defendant Nebo School District. (mh)
November 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY TO PRESIDE OVER CASE- Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, and DUCivR 72-4, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail at the address on the form. Please do not efile the Consent Form in the case. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Defendant Dylan Porter Dewey. (Notice generated by Clerk's Office) Form due by 12/19/2023. (mh)
November 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Miles Gevas on behalf of Dylan Porter Dewey (Gevas, Miles)
November 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel McKay on behalf of Dylan Porter Dewey (McKay, Daniel)
November 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett on 11/09/2023. (haa)
November 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Jane Doe as to Nebo School District Waiver sent on 11/9/2023, answer due 1/8/2024. (Carlson, Mark)
November 8, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate Judge to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr on 11/8/23. (dle)
November 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY TO PRESIDE OVER CASE- Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, and DUCivR 72-4, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail at the address on the form. Please do not efile the Consent Form in the case. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Jane Doe, Defendant Nebo School District. (Notice generated by Clerk's Office) Form due by 11/28/2023. (sg)
November 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE OF ADR, e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Jane Doe, Defendant Nebo School District. (sg)
November 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 4th District Court Provo, case number 230401147, (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4867464) filed by Nebo School District. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit B Complaint, #3 Exhibit C Order of Transfer, #4 Exhibit D Return of Service NSD Heath and Wellness Center, #5 Exhibit E Return of Service Dylan Porter Dewey, #6 Exhibit F Docket Report, #7 Exhibit G COS for Notice of Removal) (Blackham, Bradley)
November 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr. Defendant Nebo School District is directed to E-File the Notice of Removal and civil cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. (kec)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doe v. Nebo School District et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Represented By: Mark L. Carlson
Represented By: Geena Arata
Represented By: Daniel S. Garner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nebo School District
Represented By: Bradley Ross Blackham
Represented By: Andrew R. Hopkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dylan Porter Dewey
Represented By: Daniel McKay
Represented By: Miles Gevas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?