W. et al v. United Healthcare Insurance Company et al
Plaintiff: Roger W. and M. W.
Defendant: United Healthcare Insurance Company, United Behavioral Health and Proctor & Gamble U.S. Active Preferred Provider Organization Health Plan
Case Number: 2:2023cv00824
Filed: November 9, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: David Barlow
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #8 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint and Memorandum in Support . Answer deadline updated for Proctor & Gamble U.S. Active Preferred Provider Organization Health Plan answer due 1/31/2024; United Behavioral Health answer due 1/31/2024; United Healthcare Insurance Company answer due 1/31/2024. Signed by Judge David Barlow on 12/22/2023. (kpf)
December 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Proctor & Gamble U.S. Active Preferred Provider Organization Health Plan, United Behavioral Health, United Healthcare Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Hanson, Rebecca)
December 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Roger W., M. W. as to Proctor & Gamble U.S. Active Preferred Provider Organization Health Plan Waiver sent on 12/1/2023, answer due 1/30/2024. (King, Brian)
December 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Rebecca R. Hanson on behalf of Proctor & Gamble U.S. Active Preferred Provider Organization Health Plan, United Behavioral Health, United Healthcare Insurance Company (Hanson, Rebecca)
December 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 RECEIVED Magistrate Availability Form from Plaintiffs M. W., Roger W.. (mh)
November 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Roger W., M. W. as to United Healthcare Insurance Company Waiver sent on 11/10/2023, answer due 1/9/2024. (King, Brian)
November 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Roger W., M. W. as to United Behavioral Health Waiver sent on 11/10/2023, answer due 1/9/2024. (King, Brian)
November 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY TO PRESIDE OVER CASE- Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, and DUCivR 72-4, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail at the address on the form. Please do not efile the Consent Form in the case. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiffs M. W., Roger W.. (Notice generated by Clerk's Office) Form due by 12/4/2023. (sg)
November 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Judge David Barlow added. Case number will now read 2:23-cv-00824-DB. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (sg)
November 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4872099) filed by Roger W., M. W.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (King, Brian)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: W. et al v. United Healthcare Insurance Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roger W.
Represented By: Brian S. King
Represented By: Brent J. Newton
Represented By: Samuel Martin Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: M. W.
Represented By: Brian S. King
Represented By: Brent J. Newton
Represented By: Samuel Martin Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Healthcare Insurance Company
Represented By: Rebecca R. Hanson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Behavioral Health
Represented By: Rebecca R. Hanson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Proctor & Gamble U.S. Active Preferred Provider Organization Health Plan
Represented By: Rebecca R. Hanson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?