Campbell v. Olson Associates PC et al
| Lindsey Campbell |
| Olson Associates PC doing business as Olson Shaner, Randolph Chip Shaner, Jr., Rob Kolkman, Constable Kolkman LLC and NAR Inc |
| 2:2023cv00914 |
| December 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Daphne A Oberg |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Plaintiff Lindsey Campbell. (mh) |
| Filing 8 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Defendants Constable Kolkman LLC and Rob Kolkman. (mh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail at the address on the form and place Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Please do not e-file the Consent Form in the case. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Lindsey Campbell, Defendants Constable Kolkman LLC, Rob Kolkman, NAR Inc, Olson Associates PC, Randolph Chip Shaner, Jr. Form due by 3/7/2024. (mh) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendants Constable Kolkman LLC, Rob Kolkman. Attorney David Paul Gardner added to party Constable Kolkman LLC(pty:dft), Attorney David Paul Gardner added to party Rob Kolkman(pty:dft)(Gardner, David) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Certification of Issue to State Supreme Court under and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants NAR Inc, Olson Associates PC, Randolph Chip Shaner, Jr. (Price, Ronald) |
| Filing 4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants NAR Inc, Olson Associates PC, Randolph Chip Shaner, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Writ of Execution, #2 Exhibit B- State Court Docket, #3 Exhibit C - Response to Motion to Vacate, #4 Exhibit D - Complaint in Young v. Erickson) Attorney Ronald F. Price added to party NAR Inc(pty:dft), Attorney Ronald F. Price added to party Olson Associates PC(pty:dft), Attorney Ronald F. Price added to party Randolph Chip Shaner, Jr(pty:dft)(Price, Ronald) |
Filing 3
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 12/20/2023. (haa)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AUTDC-4912605) filed by Lindsey Campbell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Stephenson, Eric) |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg. Plaintiff Lindsey Campbell is directed to E-File the complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 405.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (haa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
