Trinkl v. Aldous & Associates et al
| Eduard Erik Trinkl and Erik Trinkl |
| Aldous & Associates and Dan George |
| 2:2023cv00938 |
| December 29, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Howard C Nielson |
| Daphne A Oberg |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF NON-CONSENT Consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge under DUCivR 72-4 has not been obtained. Case randomly assigned to Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr and Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg. Magistrate Judge is automatically referred under 28 U.S.C636(b)(1)(A). Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg no longer assigned as the presiding judge to the case. (mh) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Aldous & Associates, Dan George.(Klc, Peter) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF ADR, e-mailed or mailed to Defendants Aldous & Associates, Dan George, Plaintiff Eduard Erik Trinkl. (mh) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail at the address on the form and place Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Please do not e-file the Consent Form in the case. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Defendants Aldous & Associates, Dan George, Plaintiff Eduard Erik Trinkl. Form due by 2/21/2024. (mh) |
Filing 7
DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. For good cause shown, Defendants' deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is extended to February 13, 2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 1/30/2024. No attached document. (gdr)
|
| Filing 6 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Defendants Aldous & Associates, Dan George. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Order to Extend Time to Respond) Attorney Peter A. Klc added to party Aldous & Associates(pty:dft), Attorney Peter A. Klc added to party Dan George(pty:dft)(Klc, Peter) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 01/03/2024. (haa)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically as to Aldous & Associates. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (sg) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued Electronically as to Dan George. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (sg) |
| Filing 2 Requested Summons as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Supplement summons to Dan George)(Ady, Ronald) |
| Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg added. Case number will now read 2:23-cv-00938-DAO. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (sg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AUTDC-4920528) filed by Eduard Erik Trinkl. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet by Plaintiff) (Ady, Ronald) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
