In Re Intuitive Imaging Informatics
Plaintiff: Plaintiff Placeholder
Defendant: Defendant Placeholder
Petitioner: Intuitive Imaging Informatics
Case Number: 2:2023mc00740
Filed: October 17, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: David Barlow
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #1 MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF SUBPOENA PURSUANT TO 35 U.S.C. 24. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 10/26/2023. (Attachments: #1 Issued Subpoena) (mh)
October 27, 2023 Civil Case Terminated per #6 . Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero no longer assigned to case. Case closed. (mh)
October 26, 2023 Filing 5 Supplemental BRIEF Pursuant to the Magistrate's 10/25/2023 Order filed by Movant Intuitive Imaging Informatics. (mh)
October 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 DOCKET TEXT ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING. Before the court is Movant's #1 Motion for Issuance of Subpoena pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 24, which allows for issuance of a subpoena for deposition testimony. Movant's Motion does not address whether 35 U.S.C. 24 allows for the court to issue a subpoena for documents. The court therefore orders Movant to submit supplemental briefing no longer than three (3) pages explaining how the proposed subpoena complies with 35 U.S.C. 24. Movant must comply with this order no later than October 30, 2023. No attached document. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 10/25/2023. (afm)
October 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero and Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate Judge to hear and determine all non-dispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Motions referred to Cecilia M. Romero. Signed by Judge David Barlow on 10/19/23. (jdl)
October 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER REFERRING MOTION #1 Motion for Issuance of Subpoena Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 24, filed by Intuitive Imaging Informatics. Motions referred to Cecilia M. Romero. Signed by Judge David Barlow on 10/18/23. (jdl)
October 17, 2023 Filing 1 MOTION Issuance of Subpoena pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 24 filed by Movant Intuitive Imaging Informatics. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Proposed Subpoena, #2 Exhibit Proposed Order)(haa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In Re Intuitive Imaging Informatics
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Plaintiff Placeholder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Defendant Placeholder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Intuitive Imaging Informatics
Represented By: Edward T Saadi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?