C. v. O'Malley
Plaintiff: Kimberly C.
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party: Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Case Number: 2:2024cv00007
Filed: January 3, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: Daphne A Oberg
Nature of Suit: Social Security: RSI Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 22, 2024 Filing 10 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD ANSWER. The Commissioner's answer to complaint is received filed by Martin J. O'Malley. Under Supplemental Rule 6, Plaintiff Motion for Review of Agency Action must be filed and served by 3/25/2024. Under Supplemental Rule 7, Commissioner response brief must be filed and served on the plaintiff within 30 days after service of the Motion for Review of Agency Action. Under Supplemental Rule 8, Plaintiff may file and serve a reply brief within 14 days after service of the Commissioner brief. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Court Transcript Index, #2 Exhibit 2- Documents Related to Administrative Process Including Transcript of Oral Hearing, if applicable, #3 Exhibit 3- Payment Documents and Decisions, #4 Exhibit 4- Jurisdictional Documents and Notices Part 1, #5 Exhibit 5- Jurisdictional Documents and Notices Part 2, #6 Exhibit 6- Non Disability Related Development, #7 Exhibit 7- Disability Related Development Part 1, #8 Exhibit 8- Disability Related Development Part 2, #9 Exhibit Medical Records (Volumes 1 through 14), #10 Exhibit Medical Records (Volumes 15 through 24), #11 Exhibit Medical Records (Volume 25), #12 Exhibit Medical Records (Volume 25), #13 Exhibit Medical Records (Volumes 25 through 27), #14 Exhibit Medical Records (Volumes 28 through 37), #15 Exhibit Medical Records (Volumes 38 through 40))(Berndt, Amanda)
January 9, 2024 Filing 9 NOTICE OF CONSENT Under DUCivR 72-4, returned Consent Forms from all relevant parties are now filed. The Magistrate Judge is presiding by consent. (mh)
January 8, 2024 Filing 8 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Plaintiff Kimberly C.. (mh)
January 8, 2024 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Amanda A. Berndt on behalf of Martin J. O'Malley (Berndt, Amanda)
January 5, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE - Service in Social Security Case, re #5 Complaint filed. Consistent with the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions Under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and DUCivR 7-4, the court has notified the Commissioner of the commencement of this action by transmitting a Notice of Electronic Filing to the Social Security Administration and United States Attorney's Office for the District of Utah. Answer due by 3/5/2024. (sg)
January 5, 2024 Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Martin J. O'Malley (Originally received by the court on 01/03/2024). (Fee Status: IFP) filed by Kimberly C.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet ) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg (sg)
January 5, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 01/04/2023. (sg)
January 4, 2024 Filing 3 NOTICE - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail at the address on the form and place Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Please do not e-file the Consent Form in the case. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Kimberly C.. Form due by 1/25/2024. (mh)
January 3, 2024 Filing 2 DOCUMENTS LODGED consisting of Complaint and Civil Cover Sheet. Note: attached document lodged for reference purposes only; no response required unless specifically ordered by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet )(sg)
January 3, 2024 Filing 1 **SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg for review, case file forwarded to Magistrate Judge. (Received by the court on: 01/03/2024) filed by Plaintiff Kimberly C.. (sg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: C. v. O'Malley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kimberly C.
Represented By: Patricia K. Abbott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Represented By: Amanda A. Berndt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?