Vivint Inc et al v. Sunrun Inc et al
Plaintiff: Vivint Inc, Vivant Smart Home Inc. and Smart Home Pros Inc.
Defendant: Sunrun Inc, Bradley Rossiter, Zackary Andersen, Nathan Lords and Jaycen Shaw
Case Number: 2:2024cv00034
Filed: January 15, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: Dale A Kimball
Nature of Suit: Defend Trade Secrets Act (of 2016)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 16, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY TO PRESIDE OVER CASE- Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, and DUCivR 72-4, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail at the address on the form. Please do not efile the Consent Form in the case. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiffs Smart Home Pros Inc., Vivant Smart Home Inc., Vivint Inc. (Notice generated by Clerk's Office) Form due by 2/6/2024. (sg)
January 16, 2024 Filing 3 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS for appearance Pro Hac Vice mailed to attorney Michael B. Carlinsky and Rachel E. Epstein for Smart Home Pros Inc., Vivant Smart Home Inc., Vivint Inc (sg)
January 16, 2024 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under FRCP 7.1 filed by Plaintiffs Smart Home Pros Inc., Vivant Smart Home Inc., Vivint Inc identifying NRG Energy, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Wood, Stephen)
January 16, 2024 Judge Dale A. Kimball added. Case number will now read 2:24-cv-00034-DAK. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (sg)
January 15, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AUTDC-4935912) filed by Vivant Smart Home Inc., Smart Home Pros Inc., Vivint Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Zack Andersen 2024 Sales Agreement, #2 Exhibit 2 - Nate Lords 2024 Sales Agreement, #3 Exhibit 3 - Shaw 2023-2024 Employment Agreement, #4 Exhibit 4 - Rossiter 2022-2023 Employment Agreement, #5 Exhibit 5 - Rossiter Mar. 22, 2022 Restricted Stock Unit Grant Notice, #6 Exhibit 6 - Rossiter Mar. 22, 2022 Restricted Stock Unit Grant Notice, #7 Exhibit 7 - Andersen Mar. 22, 2022 RSU Agreement, #8 Exhibit 8 - 2022.03.22-Z Andersen March 22, 2022 Legacy Vivint PSU Agreement, #9 Exhibit 9 - 2023.04.15-Z Andersen April 15, 2023 NRG Phantom RSU Agreement, #10 Exhibit 10 - 2022.03.22 -N Lords March 22, 2022 Legacy Vivint RSU Agreement, #11 Exhibit 11 - 2022.03.22 -N Lords March 22, 2022 Legacy Vivint PSU Agreement, #12 Exhibit 12 - 2022.03.22 - J Shaw March 22, 2022 Legacy Vivint RSU Agreement, #13 Exhibit 13 - 2022.03.22 - J Shaw March 22, 2022 Legacy Vivint PSU Agreement, #14 Exhibit 14 - 2023.04.15 - J Shaw April 15, 2023 NRG RSU Agreement, #15 Civil Cover Sheet) (Wood, Stephen)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vivint Inc et al v. Sunrun Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vivint Inc
Represented By: Stephen Q. Wood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vivant Smart Home Inc.
Represented By: Stephen Q. Wood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Smart Home Pros Inc.
Represented By: Stephen Q. Wood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sunrun Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bradley Rossiter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Zackary Andersen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nathan Lords
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jaycen Shaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?