Lietzke v. City of Montgomery et al
| Bill Lietzke |
| City of Montgomery and Kevin Murphy |
| 2:2024cv00040 |
| January 16, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| David Barlow |
| Jared C Bennett |
| Cecilia M Romero |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF NON-CONSENT Consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge under DUCivR 72-4 has not been obtained. Case randomly assigned to Judge David Barlow and Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. Magistrate Judge is automatically referred under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B). Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett no longer assigned as the presiding judge to the case. (mh) |
| Filing 6 COMPLAINT against City of Montgomery, Kevin Murphy (Originally received by the court on 01/16/2024). (Fee Status: IFP) filed by Bill Lietzke. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope ) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett (haa) |
Filing 5
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The court will screen this case under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) and DUCivR 3-2(b). The time to serve the complaint is tolled until further order of the court. If this case is allowed to proceed, the court will order service of process on Defendant(s). Plaintiff must not file any motions or other documents during the time this case is screened or until the court orders otherwise. However, Plaintiff may file court forms (e.g., the email filing and electronic notification form for unrepresented parties and the consent to jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge form. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett on 02/06/2024. (haa)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero no longer assigned to case Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett on 2/6/2024. (alf)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail at the address on the form and place Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Please do not e-file the Consent Form in the case. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Bill Lietzke. Form due by 2/8/2024. (mh) |
| Filing 2 DOCUMENTS LODGED consisting of Complaint, summons and civil cover sheet. Note: attached document lodged for reference purposes only; no response required unless specifically ordered by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet )(haa) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/18/2024: #3 Envelope ) (haa). |
| Filing 1 **SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero for review, case file forwarded to Magistrate Judge. (Received by the court on: 01/16/2024) filed by Plaintiff Bill Lietzke. (haa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
