Xidrone Systems v. Fortem Technologies
Plaintiff: Xidrone Systems
Defendant: Fortem Technologies
Case Number: 2:2024cv00080
Filed: January 30, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: Jill N Parrish
Referring Judge: Cecilia M Romero
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 0271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 25, 2024 Filing 17 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #15 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Xidrone Systems. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H)(Risley, Stephen)
February 27, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER granting #14 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Steven P Tepera for Fortem Technologies.Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must register to efile and receive electronic notification of case activity in the District of Utah at #https://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/cmecf/dcbk.html. Instructions are available at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-electronic-case-filing.A Pro Hac Vice Attorney who fails to register for CM/ECF access will not receive notifications of electronic filings.Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice may download a copy of the District of Utahs local rules from the courts web site at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/rules-practice. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 2/27/24. (dle)
February 26, 2024 Filing 15 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Fortem Technologies. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - July 6, 2023 Complaint, DKT 002, #2 Exhibit B - October 16, 2023 Patent Case Scheduling Order, DKT 021, #3 Exhibit C - January 12, 2024 Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File a First Amended Complaint, DKT 022, #4 Exhibit D - January 26, 2024 Fortems Opposition to Motion for Leave to Amend, DKT 023, #5 Exhibit E - January 30, 2024 Plaintiffs Withdrawal of Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint, DKT 024)(Bramble, Jeffrey)
February 26, 2024 Filing 14 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Steven Tepera , Registration fee $ 50, receipt number AUTDC-4980331,Attorneys awaiting Pro Hac Vice admission should immediately register to efile and receive electronic notification of case activity in the District of Utah at #https://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/cmecf/dcbk.html.Registration requests will not be approved until the court has granted the pro hac vice motion. Instructions are available on the court's website at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-electronic-case-filing. filed by Defendant Fortem Technologies. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Application for Pro Hac Vice Admission, #2 Text of Proposed Order Granting Pro Hac Vice Admission)(Anderson, Kevin)
February 26, 2024 Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey C. Bramble on behalf of Fortem Technologies (Bramble, Jeffrey)
February 26, 2024 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Kevin N. Anderson on behalf of Fortem Technologies (Anderson, Kevin)
February 8, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Stephen R. Risley for Xidrone Systems.Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must register to efile and receive electronic notification of case activity in the District of Utah at #https://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/cmecf/dcbk.html. Instructions are available at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-electronic-case-filing.A Pro Hac Vice Attorney who fails to register for CM/ECF access will not receive notifications of electronic filings.Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice may download a copy of the District of Utahs local rules from the courts web site at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/rules-practice. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 2/8/24. (dle)
February 8, 2024 Filing 10 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Stephen R. Risley , Registration fee $ 50, receipt number AUTDC-4962377,Attorneys awaiting Pro Hac Vice admission should immediately register to efile and receive electronic notification of case activity in the District of Utah at #https://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/cmecf/dcbk.html.Registration requests will not be approved until the court has granted the pro hac vice motion. Instructions are available on the court's website at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-electronic-case-filing. filed by Plaintiff Xidrone Systems. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Application for Pro Hac Vice Admission, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Skolout, Nicole)
February 7, 2024 Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under FRCP 7.1 filed by Plaintiff Xidrone Systems. (Skolout, Nicole)
February 7, 2024 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Xidrone Systems. Summons served on 2/5/2024. (Skolout, Nicole)
February 1, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate Judge to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 2/1/2024. (lwh)
January 31, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CIVIL STANDING ORDER Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 1/31/2024. (lwh)
January 30, 2024 Filing 5 Summons Issued Electronically as to Fortem Technologies. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (sg)
January 30, 2024 Filing 4 Report on the Filing of an action sent to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (sg)
January 30, 2024 Filing 3 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS for appearance Pro Hac Vice mailed to attorney Stephen R. Risley for Xidrone Systems (sg)
January 30, 2024 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Fortem Technologies (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AUTDC-4951488) filed by Xidrone Systems. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - U.S. Patent No. 10,795,010, #2 Exhibit B - Sandia Report, #3 Exhibit C - The Fortem SkyDome System, #4 Exhibit D - June 9, 2021 XiDrone Letter to Fortem, #5 Exhibit E - '010 Patent Claim Charts, #6 Civil Cover Sheet) (Skolout, Nicole)
January 30, 2024 Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge Jill N. Parrish. Plaintiff Xidrone Systems is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 405.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (sg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Xidrone Systems v. Fortem Technologies
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Xidrone Systems
Represented By: Nicole A. Skolout
Represented By: Stephen R. Risley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fortem Technologies
Represented By: Steven P Tepera
Represented By: Jeffrey C. Bramble
Represented By: Kevin N. Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?