Kingston v. The State of Utah et al
| Louise D.S. Kingston |
| The State of Utah and Wasatch County |
| 2:2024cv00152 |
| February 28, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Howard C Nielson |
| Daphne A Oberg |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 EXHIBIT A filed by The State of Utah re #13 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and Memorandum in Support. The exhibit is not uploaded to the docket due to file type. The drive with the exhibit will be retained in a case file folder in the Clerk's Office while the case is active, and according to the retention schedule set forth by the Judicial Conference thereafter. (alf) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL of Lora E Cooper filed by Vanessa R. Walsh on behalf of The State of Utah (Walsh, Vanessa) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF NONELECTRONIC FILING of Ex. A. Bodycam video filed by Defendant The State of Utah (Walsh, Vanessa) |
| Filing 13 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant The State of Utah. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Body Cam Footage, #2 Exhibit Transcript)(Walsh, Vanessa) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Vanessa R. Walsh on behalf of The State of Utah (Walsh, Vanessa) |
Filing 11
DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time. Based on the parties' stipulation and for good cause shown, Defendant State of Utah may have up to and including April 19, 2024, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. In the future, counsel should use the event "Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer" to file this type of motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 4/11/2024. No attached document. (gdr)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Complaint filed by Defendant The State of Utah. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Daphne A. Oberg.(Cooper, Lora) |
|
Filing 9
DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time. Based on the parties' stipulation and for good cause shown, Defendant Wasatch County may have up to and including April 30, 2024, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 3/25/2024. No attached document. (gdr)
|
| Filing 8 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Wasatch County. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order to Extend Deadline to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint) Motions referred to Daphne A. Oberg. Attorney Frank D. Mylar added to party Wasatch County(pty:dft)(Mylar, Frank) |
|
Filing 7
DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Based on the parties' stipulation and for good cause shown, Defendant State of Utah may have up to and including April 12, 2024, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 3/19/2024. No attached document. (gdr)
|
| Filing 6 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #2 Notice of Removal, -1 Complaint filed by Defendant The State of Utah. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Daphne A. Oberg.(Cooper, Lora) |
| Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed by Scott Sweat served on Wasatch County on March 1, 2024. Acknowledgment filed by Louise D.S. Kingston. (North, Kara) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 3/1/24 (alt)
|
|
DOCKET TEXT ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate Judge to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr on 2/29/24. (dle)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY TO PRESIDE OVER CASE- Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, and DUCivR 72-4, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail at the address on the form. Please do not efile the Consent Form in the case. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Louise D.S. Kingston, Defendants The State of Utah, Wasatch County. (Notice generated by Clerk's Office) Form due by 3/20/2024. (sg) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 4th District Court Provo, case number 240500016, (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AUTDC-4982800) filed by The State of Utah, Wasatch County. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit B - State Docket Sheet, #3 Exhibit C - Complaint and Jury Demand, #4 Exhibit D - Acceptance of Service, #5 Exhibit E - Certificate of Service) (Cooper, Lora) |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr. Defendant The State of Utah is directed to E-File the Complaint and civil cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 405 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. (kec) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
