Lauritzen v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Daniel Lauritzen |
Auto-Owners Insurance Company |
2:2024cv00201 |
March 18, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Jared C Bennett |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Insurance Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett on 03/18/2024. (haa) |
Filing 3 NOTICE - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail at the address on the form and place Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Please do not e-file the Consent Form in the case. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Defendant Auto-Owners Insurance Company, Plaintiff Daniel Lauritzen. Form due by 4/8/2024. (mh) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF JUDICIAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. For the benefit of the public and the bar, the District of Utah offers judicial settlement conference as an alternative for dispute resolution assistance in all civil cases and bankruptcy adversary proceedings. The court offers this alternative because, when compared with litigation, it can resolve a dispute faster, at less expense, and with solutions that are better able to meet the parties' needs and interests. Parties may file a stipulated motion for judicial settlement conference. A form #motion is available on the court's website. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Defendant Auto-Owners Insurance Company, Plaintiff Daniel Lauritzen. (kec) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 3rd District Court Salt Lake County, case number 240901578, (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AUTDC-5003109) filed by Auto-Owners Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. 1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit Ex. 2 Aff. of Service, #3 Exhibit Ex. 3 State of MI Insr., #4 Exhibit Ex. 4 Docket, #5 Exhibit Ex. 5 Pleadings, #6 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Cantrell, Connor) |
Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett added. Case number will now read 2:24-cv-00201-JCB. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (kec) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lauritzen v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Daniel Lauritzen | |
Represented By: | Mark W. Dahl |
Represented By: | G. Eric Nielson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Auto-Owners Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Connor L. Cantrell |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.