G. et al v. Premera Blue Cross et al
| Mike G. and S. G. |
| Premera Blue Cross and ExtraHop Networks Inc. |
| 2:2024cv00236 |
| March 30, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Dale A Kimball |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY TO PRESIDE OVER CASE- Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, and DUCivR 72-4, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail at the address on the form. Please do not efile the Consent Form in the case. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiffs Mike G. and S. G. (Notice generated by Clerk's office) Form due by 4/22/2024. (kec) |
| Judge Dale A. Kimball added. Case number will now read 2:24-cv-00236-DAK. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (kec) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AUTDC-5017287) filed by Mike G., S. G.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (King, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
