Mendoza v. Landefeld et al
| Daniel Mendoza |
| Ryan Landefeld and RKL Diesel and Automative |
| 2:2024cv00260 |
| April 9, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Jared C Bennett |
| Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail at the address on the form and place Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Please do not e-file the Consent Form in the case. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Daniel Mendoza. Form due by 4/30/2024. (mh) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Email Filing and Notification Form by Daniel Mendoza. (alf) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ryan Landefeld, RKL Diesel and Automative (Filing fee $ 405.00, receipt number 5649) filed by Daniel Mendoza. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet ) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett (sg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
