Brooks v. O'Malley
Plaintiff: Trina Luv Brooks
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party: Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Case Number: 2:2024cv00358
Filed: May 20, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: Daphne A Oberg
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 3, 2024 Filing 12 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD ANSWER. The Commissioner's answer to #3 Complaint is received filed by Martin J. O'Malley. Under Supplemental Rule 6, Plaintiff Motion for Review of Agency Action must be filed and served by 8/2/2024. Under Supplemental Rule 7, Commissioner response brief must be filed and served on the plaintiff within 30 days after service of the Motion for Review of Agency Action. Under Supplemental Rule 8, Plaintiff may file and serve a reply brief within 14 days after service of the Commissioner brief. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 2 - Court Transcript Index, #2 Exhibit 3 - Documents Related to Administrative Process Including Transcript of Oral Hearing, if applicable, #3 Exhibit 4 - Payment Documents and Decisions, #4 Exhibit 5 - Jurisdictional Documents and Notices, #5 Exhibit 6 - Non Disability Related Development, #6 Exhibit 7 - Disability Related Development, #7 Exhibit Medical Records (Volumes 1 through 6), #8 Exhibit Medical Records (Volumes 7 through 14))(Berndt, Amanda)
May 22, 2024 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Amanda A. Berndt on behalf of Martin J. O'Malley (Berndt, Amanda)
May 21, 2024 Filing 10 NOTICE - Service in Social Security Case, re #3 Complaint filed. Consistent with the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions Under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and DUCivR 7-4, the court has notified the Commissioner of the commencement of this action by transmitting a Notice of Electronic Filing to the Social Security Administration and United States Attorney's Office for the District of Utah. Answer due by 7/22/2024. (sg)
May 21, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. 1915. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 05/21/2024. (sg)
May 21, 2024 Filing 8 NOTICE OF CONSENT Under DUCivR 72-4, returned Consent Forms from all relevant parties are now filed. The Magistrate Judge is presiding by consent. (mh)
May 21, 2024 Filing 7 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Plaintiff Trina Luv Brooks. (mh)
May 21, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE OF PRESIDING MAGISTRATE JUDGE ASSIGNMENT - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, and DUCivR 72-4, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail to the address on the form. Please do not efile the Consent Form in the case. Notice emailed or mailed to Plaintiff Trina Luv Brooks. Form due by 6/11/2024. (mh)
May 20, 2024 Filing 5 Modification of Docket: Error: Counsel filed their own Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis Dkt #4 . Correction: Dkt #1 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis has been stricken. (sg)
May 20, 2024 Filing 4 **SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. and Memorandum in Support Case file will be forwarded to a Magistrate Judge after intake review, filed by Plaintiff Trina Luv Brooks. (Lambert, Loren)
May 20, 2024 Filing 3 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with In Forma Pauperis request filed by Trina Luv Brooks. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Lambert, Loren)
May 20, 2024 Filing 2 DOCUMENTS LODGED consisting of Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet. Note: attached document lodged for reference purposes only; no response required unless specifically ordered by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(sg)
May 20, 2024 Filing 1 **SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg for review, case file forwarded to Magistrate Judge. (Received by the court on: 05/20/2024) filed by Plaintiff Trina Luv Brooks. (sg) Modified on 5/20/2024 (sg). Text Stricken, counsel has filed their own motion see dkt #4

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brooks v. O'Malley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Represented By: Amanda A. Berndt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Trina Luv Brooks
Represented By: Loren M. Lambert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?