Ledezma v. Contact US Teleservices
| Filiberto Ledezma |
| Contact US Teleservices Inc; a Texas Corporation doing business as Atento doing business as Atento US |
| Filiberto Ledezma |
| Contact US Teleservices |
| 2:2024cv00359 |
| May 20, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Utah |
| Dustin B Pead |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 REPORT OF ATTORNEY PLANNING MEETING. (Head, David) |
| Filing 15 Stipulated MOTION for Scheduling Order and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Filiberto Ledezma, Counter Defendant Filiberto Ledezma. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Head, David) |
Filing 14
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 7/8/24. (haa)
|
| Filing 13 ANSWER to #12 Counterclaim (Jury Demand) filed by Filiberto Ledezma.(Head, David) |
| Filing 12 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against Filiberto Ledezma filed by Contact US Teleservices.(Goebel, Heidi) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF CONSENT Under DUCivR 72-4, returned Consent Forms from all relevant parties are now filed. The Magistrate Judge is presiding by consent. (mh) |
| Filing 10 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Defendant Contact US Teleservices. (mh) |
| Filing 9 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Plaintiff Filiberto Ledezma. (mh) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Michael W. Massiatte for Contact US Teleservices.Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must register to efile and receive electronic notification of case activity in the District of Utah at #https://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/cmecf/dcbk.html. Instructions are available at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-electronic-case-filing.A Pro Hac Vice Attorney who fails to register for CM/ECF access will not receive notifications of electronic filings.Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice may download a copy of the District of Utahs local rules from the courts web site at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/rules-practice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 5/22/2024. (alf)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Michael W. Massiatte , Registration fee $ 50, receipt number AUTDC-5067943,Attorneys awaiting Pro Hac Vice admission should immediately register to efile and receive electronic notification of case activity in the District of Utah at #https://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/cmecf/dcbk.html.Registration requests will not be approved until the court has granted the pro hac vice motion. Instructions are available on the court's website at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-electronic-case-filing. filed by Defendant Contact US Teleservices. (Attachments: #1 Application for Pro Hac Vice, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Goebel, Heidi) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 5/21/24. (haa)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF PRESIDING MAGISTRATE JUDGE ASSIGNMENT - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, and DUCivR 72-4, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at [email protected] or mail to the address on the form. Please do not efile the Consent Form in the case. Notice emailed or mailed to Defendant Contact US Teleservices, Plaintiff Filiberto Ledezma. Form due by 6/11/2024. (mh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF JUDICIAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. For the benefit of the public and the bar, the District of Utah offers judicial settlement conference as an alternative for dispute resolution assistance in all civil cases and bankruptcy adversary proceedings. The court offers this alternative because, when compared with litigation, it can resolve a dispute faster, at less expense, and with solutions that are better able to meet the parties' needs and interests. Parties may file a stipulated motion for judicial settlement conference. A form #motion is available on the court's website. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Defendant Contact US Teleservices, Plaintiff Filiberto Ledezma. (kec) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS for appearance Pro Hac Vice mailed to attorney Michael W. Massiatte for Contact US Teleservices per #2 complaint. (kec) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 4th District Utah County, case number 240401316, (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AUTDC-5067024) filed by Contact US Teleservices, Atento US. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - Docket sheet from state court case, #3 Exhibit 3 - No Scheduling Order in Place, #4 Exhibit 4 - Combined State Court Documents, #5 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Goebel, Heidi) |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead. Defendants Atento US, Contact US Teleservices is directed to E-File the Notice of Removal and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 405.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. (sg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
