H. v. United Healthcare Insurance Company et al
Johnny H. |
United Behavioral Health and United Healthcare Insurance Company |
2:2024cv00389 |
May 30, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Jill N Parrish |
Cecilia M Romero |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 CIVIL STANDING ORDER Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 7/23/2024. (lwh) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher J. Martinez on behalf of United Behavioral Health, United Healthcare Insurance Company (Martinez, Christopher) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF NON-CONSENT Consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge under DUCivR 72-4 has not been obtained. Case randomly assigned to Judge Jill N. Parrish and Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero. Magistrate Judge is automatically referred under 28 U.S.C636(b)(1)(A). Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero no longer assigned as the presiding judge to the case. (mh) |
Filing 8 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Defendants United Behavioral Health, United Healthcare Insurance Company. (mh) |
Filing 7 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Plaintiff Johnny H.. (mh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF JUDICIAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. For the benefit of the public and the bar, the District of Utah offers judicial settlement conference as an alternative for dispute resolution assistance in all civil cases and bankruptcy adversary proceedings. The court offers this alternative because, when compared with litigation, it can resolve a dispute faster, at less expense, and with solutions that are better able to meet the parties' needs and interests. Parties may file a stipulated motion for judicial settlement conference. A form #motion is available on the court's website. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Johnny H., Defendants United Behavioral Health, United Healthcare Insurance Company. (mh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF PRESIDING MAGISTRATE JUDGE ASSIGNMENT - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, and DUCivR 72-4, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail to the address on the form. Please do not efile the Consent Form in the case. Notice emailed or mailed to Plaintiff Johnny H., Defendants United Behavioral Health, United Healthcare Insurance Company. Form due by 7/11/2024. (mh) |
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Johnny H. (King, Brian) |
Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Johnny H. (King, Brian) |
Filing 2 ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 6/3/2024. (haa) |
Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero added. Case number will now read 2:24-cv-00389-CMR. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (kec) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United Behavioral Health, United Healthcare Insurance Company (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AUTDC-5077487) filed by Johnny H., individually and on behalf of J.H., a minor,. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (King, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.