Brunner v. City of Payson Police Department et al
| Donald Earl Brunner |
| FNU Cox, J. D. Tarone, Bill, William Wright, J Thompson, City of Payson Police Department, FNU Taylor, Brad D Bishop and Justin Pearson |
| 2:2024cv00447 |
| June 21, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Cecilia M Romero |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 THIS CASE HAS BEEN CLOSED pursuant to order of consolidation. All docketing will be in the lead case 2:24cv00338-CMR. NO FURTHER DOCKETING ON THIS CASE. (alf) |
| Filing 9 Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero per consolidation to lead case 2:24cv338-CMR.(alf) |
Filing 8
ORDER Consolidating cases 2:24cv339-DAO, 2:24cv393-JCB and 2:24cv447 into lead case 2:24cv338-CMR. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 8/9/2024. (alf)
|
| Filing 7 DOCUMENTS LODGED consisting of Motion for Indigent status as to accessing Pacer. Note: attached document lodged for reference purposes only; no response required unless specifically ordered by the court. (alf) |
| Filing 6 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Plaintiff Donald Earl Brunner. (mh) |
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Brad D Bishop, City of Payson Police Department, FNU Cox, Justin Pearson, J. D. Tarone, FNU Taylor, J Thompson, William Wright (Originally received by the court on 6/21/2024). (Fee Status: In Forma Pauperis) filed by Donald Earl Brunner. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet ) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett (kec) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/1/2024: #2 Corrected page orientation) (kb). |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The court will screen this case and the time to serve the complaint is tolled. If this case is allowed to proceed, the court will order service of process on Defendant(s). Plaintiff must not file any motions or other documents during the time this case is screened. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett on 6/24/2024. (kec)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF PRESIDING MAGISTRATE JUDGE ASSIGNMENT - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, and DUCivR 72-4, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail to the address on the form. Please do not efile the Consent Form in the case. Notice emailed or mailed to Plaintiff Donald Earl Brunner. Form due by 7/12/2024. (mh) |
| Filing 2 DOCUMENTS LODGED consisting of Complaint and Civil Cover Sheet. Note: attached document lodged for reference purposes only; no response required unless specifically ordered by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(kec) |
| Filing 1 **SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett for review, case file forwarded to Magistrate Judge. (Received by the court on: 6/21/2024) filed by Plaintiff Donald Earl Brunner. (kec) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
