Cricut, Inc. v. Europe Warehouse GMBH & Co. KG et al
| Cricut, Inc. |
| Kreativeplotter GMBH & Co. KG, Europe Warehouse GMBH & Co. KG and Torsten Jung-Lenz |
| 2:2024cv00505 |
| July 17, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Daphne A Oberg |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet (JS44) re #1 Complaint Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance, filed by Cricut, Inc.. (Fuller, Brandon) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re #1 Complaint. The Civil Cover Sheet is missing or incomplete. All civil actions presented for filing must be accompanied by a completed Civil Cover Sheet. See Local Rule RUCivR3-4. Counsel must file a completed Civil Cover Sheet JS44 immediately. (kec) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AUTDC-5127233) filed by Cricut, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Distribution Agreement, #2 Exhibit Distribution Agreement - Amendment No. 1) (Fuller, Brandon) |
| Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg added. Case number will now read 2:24-cv-00505-DAO. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (kec) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
