Ramos v. Compass Group et al
| Mical L Ramos |
| Delta Airlines doing business as Delta Sky Club and Compass Group doing business as Eurest |
| 2:2024cv00511 |
| July 19, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Utah |
| Daphne A Oberg |
| Jill N Parrish |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Employment Discrim |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
NOTICE OF NON-CONSENT Consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge under DUCivR 72-4 has not been obtained. Case randomly assigned to Judge Jill N. Parrish and Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg. Magistrate Judge is automatically referred under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B). Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg no longer assigned as the presiding judge to the case. (mh)
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Errata by Compass Group, Delta Airlines re #4 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Memorandum in Support (Attachments: #1 Errata 1 - Declaration) (Dawson, Micah)
|
Filing 4
MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Compass Group, Delta Airlines. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration, #2 Exhibit A to Exhibit 1 Declaration, #3 Exhibit 1 - Charge, #4 Text of Proposed Order proposed Order)(Dawson, Micah)
|
Filing 3
NOTICE OF PRESIDING MAGISTRATE JUDGE ASSIGNMENT - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, and DUCivR 72-4, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at [email protected] or mail to the address on the form. Please do not efile the Consent Form in the case. Notice emailed or mailed to Defendants Compass Group, Delta Airlines, Plaintiff Mical L Ramos. Form due by 8/9/2024. (mh)
|
Filing 2
NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF JUDICIAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. For the benefit of the public and the bar, the District of Utah offers judicial settlement conference as an alternative for dispute resolution assistance in all civil cases and bankruptcy adversary proceedings. The court offers this alternative because, when compared with litigation, it can resolve a dispute faster, at less expense, and with solutions that are better able to meet the parties' needs and interests. Parties may file a stipulated motion for judicial settlement conference. A form #motion is available on the court's website. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Defendants Compass Group, Delta Airlines, Plaintiff Mical L Ramos. (sg)
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 3rd Judicial District Court for Salt Lake County, case number 240904377, (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AUTDC-5129807) filed by Delta Airlines dba Delta Sky Club, Compass Group dba Eurest. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Civil Docket, #3 Exhibit C - State Court Notice of Removal, #4 Exhibit D - Declaration of C. Francesco, #5 Exhibit E - Declaration of Corporate Citizen, #6 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Dawson, Micah)
|
Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg added. Case number will now read 2:24-cv-00511-DAO. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (sg)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.