Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Acima Holdings et al
| Consumer Financial Protection Bureau |
| Acima Holdings, Acima Digital LLC formerly known as Acima Credit LLC doing business as Acima Leasing, Acima Credit LLC and Aaron Allred |
| 2:2024cv00525 |
| July 26, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| David Barlow |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 12 U.S.C. ยง 5531 Consumer Financial Protection Act Prohibiting unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants No Fee Required - US Government filed by Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Trombley, Sarah) |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge David Barlow. Plaintiff Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) by the end of the business day. Filing Fee waived (Filing on Behalf of the United States)NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (sg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
