H. et al v. United Healthcare Insurance Company et al
| J. H. and William H. |
| United Healthcare Insurance Company, Splunk, Inc., United Behavioral Health and Splunk, Inc. Medical Plan |
| 2:2024cv00531 |
| July 29, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Utah |
| Dustin B Pead |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS for appearance Pro Hac Vice emailed to attorney Clarissa A. Kang for Splunk, Inc., Splunk, Inc. Medical Plan (mh)
|
|
Filing 6
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by William H., J. H. (King, Brian)
|
|
Filing 5
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by William H., J. H. (King, Brian)
|
|
Filing 4
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by William H., J. H. (King, Brian)
|
|
Filing 3
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by William H., J. H. (King, Brian)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 7/31/2024. (haa)
|
|
Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead added. Case number will now read 2:24-cv-00531-DBP. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (kec)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AUTDC-5138039) filed by William H., J. H.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (King, Brian)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
