Smith-Young v. Earnshaw
| Finesse Nikkol Smith-Young |
| Dallas Earnshaw |
| Correction Section (FYI) |
| 2:2024cv00537 |
| July 30, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Utah |
| Ann Marie McIff Allen |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
DOCKET TEXT ORDER requiring Petitioner to within thirty days SHOW CAUSE why this action should not be administratively closed because Petitioner has not supported the motion to proceed without paying the court filing fee by submitting a certified inmate-account statement showing "all receipts, expenditures, and balances during the last six months." (ECF No. 2.) No attached document. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 08/06/2024. (kpf)
|
| Filing 2 **SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg for review, case file forwarded to Magistrate Judge. (Received by the court on: 07/29/2024) filed by Petitioner Finesse Nikkol Smith-Young. (sg) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - State, under 28 U.S.C. 2241 Fee Status: Pending IFP. (Originally received on 07/29/2024) filed by Finesse Nikkol Smith-Young. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope ) Assigned to Judge Ann Marie McIff Allen (sg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
