Hafen v. Wade et al
Plaintiff: Jonathan O. Hafen
Defendant: K W Service Company LC Profit Sharing Plan, Ken A Wade, Revlis Investments LLC and 37 Leasing LC
Case Number: 2:2024cv00549
Filed: July 31, 2024
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: Tena Campbell
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1367 Other Property Damage
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 1, 2024 Filing 2 NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY TO PRESIDE OVER CASE- Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, and DUCivR 72-4, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at [email protected] or mail at the address on the form. Please do not efile the Consent Form in the case. Notice emailed or mailed to Plaintiff Jonathan O. Hafen. (Notice generated by Clerk's Office) Form due by 8/22/2024. (sg)
August 1, 2024 Judge Tena Campbell added. Case number will now read 2:24-cv-00549-TC. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (sg)
July 31, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 37 Leasing LC, K W Service Company LC Profit Sharing Plan, Revlis Investments LLC, Ken A Wade with filing fee previously paid (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AUTDC-5140694) filed by Jonathan O. Hafen. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Balls, Jeffery) Modified on 8/1/2024 (sg). Text stricken, entered receipt number.
July 31, 2024 Civil Case Filing Fee received from Plaintiff Jonathan O. Hafen. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AUTDC-5140694). (Balls, Jeffery)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hafen v. Wade et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: K W Service Company LC Profit Sharing Plan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ken A Wade
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Revlis Investments LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 37 Leasing LC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jonathan O. Hafen
Represented By: Jeffery A. Balls
Represented By: Joseph Covey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?