Hafen v. Sargent et al
| Jonathan O. Hafen |
| Jake Peterson, Natalie Peterson, Brandon Sargent, Lucy Ann Chard, Tyler Hawkes, Michael G Chard, Cameron Sargent, Michelle Chard, Thomas Chard, Natalie Hawkes and Nicolle Chard |
| 2:2024cv00642 |
| August 28, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Tena Campbell |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Requested Summons as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Cameron Sargent, #2 Text of Proposed Order Tyler Hawkes, #3 Text of Proposed Order Natalie Hawkes, #4 Text of Proposed Order Michael G. Chard, #5 Text of Proposed Order Lucy Ann Chard, #6 Text of Proposed Order Michelle Chard, #7 Text of Proposed Order Nicole Chard, #8 Text of Proposed Order Thomas Chard, #9 Text of Proposed Order Jake Peterson, #10 Text of Proposed Order Natalie Peterson)(Melton, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AUTDC-5167323) filed by Jonathan O. Hafen. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Melton, Thomas) |
| Judge Tena Campbell added per General Order 19-001. Case number will now read 2:24-cv-00642-TC. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (kec) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
