Cricut Inc v. Zhan
| Cricut Inc |
| LiPing Zhan |
| 2:2024cv00746 |
| October 4, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Cecilia M Romero |
| Robert J Shelby |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 0271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Summons Issued Electronically as to LiPing Zhan. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (sg) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Related Cases by Cricut Inc (Stewart, Jeremy) |
Filing 13
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Alexander P. Ott for Cricut Inc.Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must register to efile and receive electronic notification of case activity in the District of Utah at #https://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/cmecf/dcbk.html. Instructions are available at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-electronic-case-filing.A Pro Hac Vice Attorney who fails to register for CM/ECF access will not receive notifications of electronic filings.Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice may download a copy of the District of Utahs local rules from the courts web site at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/rules-practice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 10/10/2024. (kpf)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Jay H Reiziss for Cricut Inc.Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must register to efile and receive electronic notification of case activity in the District of Utah at #https://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/cmecf/dcbk.html. Instructions are available at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-electronic-case-filing.A Pro Hac Vice Attorney who fails to register for CM/ECF access will not receive notifications of electronic filings.Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice may download a copy of the District of Utahs local rules from the courts web site at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/rules-practice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 10/10/2024. (kpf)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney David J Tobin for Cricut Inc.Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must register to efile and receive electronic notification of case activity in the District of Utah at #https://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/cmecf/dcbk.html. Instructions are available at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-electronic-case-filing.A Pro Hac Vice Attorney who fails to register for CM/ECF access will not receive notifications of electronic filings.Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice may download a copy of the District of Utahs local rules from the courts web site at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/rules-practice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 10/10/2024. (kpf)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 10/8/24. (mh)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Alexander P. Ott , Registration fee $ 50, receipt number AUTDC-5207516,Attorneys awaiting Pro Hac Vice admission should immediately register to efile and receive electronic notification of case activity in the District of Utah at #https://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/cmecf/dcbk.html.Registration requests will not be approved until the court has granted the pro hac vice motion. Instructions are available on the court's website at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-electronic-case-filing. filed by Plaintiff Cricut Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Application, #2 Exhibit 2 - Text of Proposed Order)(Stewart, Jeremy) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Jay H. Reiziss , Registration fee $ 50, receipt number AUTDC-5207506,Attorneys awaiting Pro Hac Vice admission should immediately register to efile and receive electronic notification of case activity in the District of Utah at #https://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/cmecf/dcbk.html.Registration requests will not be approved until the court has granted the pro hac vice motion. Instructions are available on the court's website at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-electronic-case-filing. filed by Plaintiff Cricut Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Application, #2 Exhibit 2 - Text of Proposed Order)(Stewart, Jeremy) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of David J. Tobin , Registration fee $ 50, receipt number AUTDC-5207498,Attorneys awaiting Pro Hac Vice admission should immediately register to efile and receive electronic notification of case activity in the District of Utah at #https://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/cmecf/dcbk.html.Registration requests will not be approved until the court has granted the pro hac vice motion. Instructions are available on the court's website at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-electronic-case-filing. filed by Plaintiff Cricut Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Application, #2 Exhibit 2 - Text of Proposed Order)(Stewart, Jeremy) |
| Filing 6 Case reassigned under DUCivR 83-2(a)(2), for the efficient administration of justice, this case is transferred to Judge Robert J. Shelby. Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr. no longer assigned to the case. Orders of the prior judge are affirmed including the order of reference to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero under 28:636 (b)(1)(A).Case number will now read 2:24-cv-00746-RJS-CMR. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (jwt) |
|
Filing 5
DOCKET TEXT ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate Judge to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr on 10/7/24. (dle)
|
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under FRCP 7.1 filed by Plaintiff Cricut Inc. (Stewart, Jeremy) |
| Filing 3 Report on the Filing of an action sent to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Attachments: #1 Supplement) (kec) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS for appearance Pro Hac Vice mailed to attorney David J. Tobin, Jay H. Reiziss and Alexander P. Ott for Cricut Inc (kec) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against LiPing Zhan (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AUTDC-5205358) filed by Cricut Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1-646 Patent Chart Konduone, #3 Exhibit 2- D563 Konduone) (Stewart, Jeremy) |
| Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr added. Case number will now read 2:24-cv-00746-HCN. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (kec) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cricut Inc v. Zhan | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Cricut Inc | |
| Represented By: | Jeremy J. Stewart |
| Represented By: | Matthew L. Lalli |
| Represented By: | Jay H. Reiziss |
| Represented By: | David J. Tobin |
| Represented By: | Alexander P. Ott |
| Represented By: | Alexander P. Ott |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: LiPing Zhan | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
