Madriz v. Redd
Plaintiff: Pablo Madriz
Defendant: Brian Redd
Unknown: Prisoner Litigation Unit and Correction Section (FYI)
Case Number: 2:2025cv00186
Filed: March 10, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: Howard C Nielson
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 27, 2025 Filing 9 Partial Filing fee: $15.50 received, receipt number 11234. (mdj)
July 21, 2025 Filing 8 Partial Filing fee: $ 16.68 received, receipt number 10816 (kop)
June 20, 2025 Filing 7 Partial Filing fee: $ 15.50 received, receipt number 10470 (kop)
June 3, 2025 Filing 6 DOCUMENTS LODGED consisting of Exhaustion of Legal Remedies. Note: attached document lodged for reference purposes only; no response required unless specifically ordered by the court. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kpf)
March 17, 2025 Filing 5 Initial Prisoner Filing Fee: $ 20.67 received, receipt number 9372 (sg)
March 13, 2025 Filing 4 **SEALED DOCUMENT** FINANCIAL CERTIFICATE by Plaintiff Pablo Madriz received from Correctional Institution. Initial Partial Filing Fee $ 20.67. (Attachments: #1 FFF Initial Payment Statement, #2 Inmate Statement)(kpf)
March 12, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 3 DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepaying the Filing Fee. Based on the inmate's attached Required Authorization, Consent, and Declaration, the inmate account office is authorized and requested to: 1) within 14 days file the Financial Certificate showing the Initial Partial Filing Fee together with the inmate account statement as outlined in the attached instructions, and 2) remit the initial partial filing fee within 30 days as outlined in the attached instructions. It is ultimately Plaintiffs responsibility to ensure these items are received from the inmate account office. Failure to comply will result in case dismissal without prejudice and without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett on 03/12/2025. (kpf)
March 10, 2025 Filing 2 **SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett for review, case file forwarded to PLU. (Received by the court on: 03/10/2025) filed by Plaintiff Pablo Madriz. (sg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Madriz v. Redd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pablo Madriz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brian Redd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Unknown: Prisoner Litigation Unit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Unknown: Correction Section (FYI)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?