Hadlock v. Remington Arms et al
Plaintiff: Todd C Hadlock
Defendant: Remington Arms and Remington Arms Company, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2025cv00582
Filed: July 18, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: Tena Campbell
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2025 Filing 16 JUDGMENT that the claims against RemArms are dismissed without prejudice for lack of personal jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 9/16/25 (alt)
September 16, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER granting #12 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction; terminating as moot #12 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Parties must file a status report within 30 days after the conclusion of the Remington Arms bankruptcy proceedings; or, if those proceedings are ongoing, within one year from the date of the order. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 9/16/25 (alt)
September 16, 2025 Filing 14 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re #7 Notice (Other). The document Filer used the wrong filing event, "Notice (Other)", instead of "Notice of Filing Bankruptcy". Because the wrong event was used the case was not properly stayed as to Remington Arms. The clerk will manually set the Stay in the case. Parties are reminded to use care when selecting filing events. (alt)
September 16, 2025 Filing 13 NOTICE: The court received a bounce-back notification that a secondary email address of [email protected], for attorney Norman W. Peat as invalid. As a result, the court has removed the invalid secondary email address from CM/ECF. Going forward, the court will not send email notifications to [email protected]. To learn how to update your secondary email address, please visit https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/update-your-address-court. (nl) Modified on 9/16/2025 corrected attorney name with invalid email (nl).
September 16, 2025 Modification of Docket: Error: Parties were not added correctly at case opening: "Remington Firearms" and "Remington" are not separate dft parties - they are DBAs of RemArms. Correction: "Remington Firearms" and "Remington" have been removed as separate dft parties and added as DBAs of RemArms per the original state court complaint. (alt)
August 14, 2025 Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Memorandum in Support, MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant RemArms. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Hunter Cummings)(Parker, Rodney)
August 8, 2025 Filing 11 RECEIVED Magistrate Availability Form from Defendants RemArms, Remington Arms. (mh)
July 28, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 10 DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #2 Notice of Removal (complaint originally filed in state court). Answer/Response deadline updated for RemArms to 8/15/2025. So ordered by Judge Tena Campbell on 7/28/25 (docket text only - no attached document) (alt)
July 28, 2025 Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re #8 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time. Filer selected the wrong motion relief, the generic "Extension of Time". As the motion seeks to extend time to respond to a complaint, the motion relief "Extension of Time to File Answer" must be used and the entry should be linked to the complaint. The clerk will correct the motion relief and entry text at this time; however, all filers are reminded to use care to select the correct motion relief going forward. (alt)
July 23, 2025 Filing 8 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #2 Notice of Removal filed by Defendant RemArms. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Parker, Rodney) Modified on 7/28/2025: corrected motion relief and entry text per 9 Notice (alt)
July 23, 2025 Filing 7 NOTICE of of Bankruptcy Filing by Remington Arms (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Petition for Filing for Bankruptcy) (Parker, Rodney)
July 23, 2025 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Rodney R. Parker on behalf of Remington Arms (Parker, Rodney)
July 21, 2025 Filing 5 NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF JUDICIAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. For the benefit of the public and the bar, the District of Utah offers judicial settlement conference as an alternative for dispute resolution assistance in all civil cases and bankruptcy adversary proceedings. The court offers this alternative because, when compared with litigation, it can resolve a dispute faster, at less expense, and with solutions that are better able to meet the parties' needs and interests. Parties may file a stipulated motion for judicial settlement conference. A form #motion is available on the court's website. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Todd C Hadlock, Defendant RemArms. (kec)
July 18, 2025 Filing 4 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS for appearance Pro Hac Vice emailed to attorney Andrew A. Lothson for Remington Arms Company, LLC. (mdj)
July 18, 2025 Filing 3 NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY TO PRESIDE OVER CASE- Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, and DUCivR 72-3, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at [email protected] or mail at the address on the form. Please do not e-file the Consent Form in the case. Notice emailed or mailed to Defendant RemArms. (Notice generated by Clerk's Office) Form due by 8/8/2025. (mdj)
July 18, 2025 Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 8th District Court Uintah County, case number 240800093, (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AUTDC-5493495) filed by RemArms. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A State Court Pleadings, #2 Exhibit B Consent, #3 Civil Cover Sheet cover sheet) (Parker, Rodney)
July 18, 2025 Filing 1 Case has been indexed. Defendant Remarms is directed to E-File the Notice of Removal and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 405.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction and a judge will not be assigned until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. (sg)
July 18, 2025 Judge Tena Campbell added. Case number will now read 2:25-cv-582-TC. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (mdj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hadlock v. Remington Arms et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Todd C Hadlock
Represented By: Norman W. Peat, Jr
Represented By: Justin D. Heideman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Remington Arms
Represented By: Rodney R. Parker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Remington Arms Company, Inc.
Represented By: Rodney R. Parker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?