Northshore Rail Services LLC v. Southern Pacific Railroad Company et al
| Northshore Rail Services LLC |
| Southern Pacific Railroad Company and Union Pacific Railroad Company |
| 2:2025cv00585 |
| July 18, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Utah |
| Dustin B Pead |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE FROM THE COURT re #1 Notice of Removal. Attorney selected the incorrect division when creating the case. Case 2:25-cv-00585 will be closed and all pleadings will be transferred to case 1:25-cv-00103. Case number will now read 1:25-cv-00103. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (kec) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under FRCP 7.1 filed by Defendants Southern Pacific Railroad Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company identifying Union Pacific Corporation as Corporate Parent. (Paseman, Anna) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 2nd District Court Weber County, case number 250904217, (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AUTDC-5493618) filed by Union Pacific Railroad Company, Southern Pacific Railroad Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State Court Docket and Documents, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Paseman, Anna) |
| Civil Case Terminated. (kec) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
